Laserfiche WebLink
Now I do want to address that and look atthat in the Subdivision Code, and have road standards <br />for subdividing off of the existing County roads. I think that is a weakness in the standard. That <br />isn€t anything that€s covered by any of the proposed bills. It€s not something that would be dealt <br />with by level of service standards, these LOS A to F, because those strictly relate to congestion. <br />Typically in these country type roads that may be really substandard even for the subdivisions <br />that are there. Even if you subdivide out you€re not going to have congestion on the road in the <br />sense that these level of service things are measured. The problem is the road itself may be, you <br />know, 9 feet wide. But there may be 20-acre lots along that are zoned Ag-3 and there is potential <br />for further rezoning. I think that is a valid issue. It€s something that, as I say, I€d like to address. <br />It€s just not something I jumped on this round of revisions todo. Ideally it would be done in an <br />overall look at the Subdivision Code. <br />SIRACUSA:May I follow-up? <br />GRAHAM:Yes, Commissioner Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:Yes, because there wasanother, at the bottom of that same page where <br />you say, Often the final uses on the property are not clear at the time of zoning.‚ We all have <br />examples of that in our heads. For example, commercial zoning allows a wide range of uses that <br />generate different traffic demands, including homes, fast food, blah, blah, blah. And, to me, this <br />says well this is all the more reason to review the list of permitted uses for the different types of <br />zoning; and yet when you gave the talk to us at our year-end meeting in December I think it was <br />that you indicated that the Department had no intention of going there. And so it seems to me <br />that, for one thing, you€re saying we€re not going to go there, but on the other hand you€re <br />admitting that the problem exists. And I don€t understand why we can€t look at addressing some <br />of these problems. <br />YUEN:We have had some site specific types of commercial zoning and if you -. <br />Let€s step back a little. Text book zoning, if you pull out a text book on how you do zoning, the <br />text book will say something like the idea is you zone the property for commercial use and then <br />you let the market determine what exact types of uses are going to be on it; and there should be a <br />flexibility of this over time. The needs change over time. The goal is that you, is the site <br />appropriate for a commercial type of use, make sure that the infrastructure is appropriate for it, <br />you go through the range of things that can be allowed, and then you zone it; and you don€t <br />worry whether it€s a restaurant, an office building, a retail store and the like. That€s a classic text <br />book zoning. <br />We€ve had many circumstances where people come in for commercial zoning with an idea of I <br />want to do X.‚ Like a gentleman in Kau a couple of months ago, he had an existing home, he <br />wants to keep the home, he wants to convert it to an office. It won€t qualify as a home <br />occupation because he wants to have more people there than you can have as a home occupation. <br />This is all he wants to do. If we look at that picture it looks very attractive. If you do the whole <br />analysis of, well, what if he made a 7-Eleven, you know, then you start to maybe look at it a little <br />differently. So in realizing that and seeing a number of these situations over time, we have <br />deviated from what I would, you know, say zoning textbook and had various site specific <br />7EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />