Laserfiche WebLink
County Planning Commission? Seeing none, Mr. Lim do you have any closing <br />statements? <br />CHUN:Yes, thank you for your time this morning Commissioners. I just <br />wanted to share a little as to the purpose of this request for this extension at this time. <br />The subject parcel is part of Kamehameha€s master plan for Keauhou. And <br />implementation of that master plan is predicated on us identifying and selecting a <br />development partner that we would be working with. That process has been ongoing for <br />the last 8 months. That process has been delayed due to a number of complications in <br />the- the complexities of this particular master plan. We anticipate that we will be able to- <br />our original timeline was that we would have selected a development partner by the end <br />of the first quarter this year. We anticipate now that that selection won€t be done or not <br />completed until within the- this year by December of this year. And thus, the request for <br />the extension. <br />GALDONES:Thank you for that- for that information Mr. Chun. <br />Commissionersanyfurtherdiscussion?CommissionerSpringer? <br />SPRINGER:Thankyou.HearingDr.Chun€stestimonyIfeeltheneedtorecuse <br />myself from this agenda item. I did some consultant work for one of the respondents to <br />the request for a proposal on the development of the master plan. <br />GALDONES:So noted that Commissioner Springer is recusing herself from <br />voting on this subject matter. Seeing no further discussion of the- Director recommends <br />that this request be approved by the Planning Commission and a motion is in order. <br />LIM:Mr. Chairman. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Lim. <br />LIM:I have a couple of comments on the proposed conditions. <br />GALDONES:Proceed. <br />LIM:As you notice, the Planning Directors recommending that the final <br />plan approval in condition number 2 recommending that the final plan approval be <br />secured from the planning department within 2 years from the effective date of this new <br />amendment and that is acceptable to us. When you go to paragraph, condition number 5, <br />they have essentially replaced the former condition 5 with a new condition 5 which <br />reflects the verbatim statements from the Department of Public Works on this application <br />and my discussions with Mr. Ki Emler from Department of Public Works this morning, I <br />think he confirmed that this does not mean that there€s going to be additional <br />improvements but that- it€s reflected but their current statement on all these rezonings, I <br />think that- he€s thinking that- at least the Public Works department is thinking that there <br />may be additional improvements to the intersection near Kamehameha III and the Alii- <br />current Alii Drive. And those improvements will be addressed at the time- probably at <br />4 <br /> <br />