My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-03-18 TKIC
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-03-18 TKIC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:08:55 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:08:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the time that the land use commission proceeding lands mauka of the railroad right of <br />way are constructed and thats why you see that statement in there, on the last sentence <br />that says that the construction of the improvements can be deferred if we post bonds so <br />that we can time the construction to coordinate with the mauka lands development. So <br />we dont have to build out improvements and tear them down when the intersection is <br />rebuilt because of the- the larger project. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Emler you concur with Mr. Lims statement? <br />EMLER:Public works (inaudible) I think in this condition says, said <br />improvements may be deferred until required by the Department of Public Works. So I <br />believe the conditions (inaudible). Im happy with the condition as written but I do in <br />general concur with the representative. <br />GALDONES:ThankyouMr.Emler.Commissionersanyfurtherdiscussion? <br />FUJIKAWA:Excuseme. <br />GALDONES:CommissionerFujikawa. <br />FUJIKAWA:Howdoyouwantitreadoutonthecorrection,isthereany <br />correction staff? <br />GALDONES:It is my understanding, it is just, the way that it is going to be <br />interpreted by the parties how its going to be applied. So theres not going to be any <br />amendment to what is already written before us. <br />FUJIKAWA:Okay. <br />LIM:Mr. Chairman. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Lim. <br />LIM:My last comment is on paragraph number 12 which is the standard <br />time extension. The Planning Director is proposing that the time extension paragraph be <br />removed entirely from the permit and as Dr. Chun described- this is a rather complex <br />process in selection of the master developer and until that developer is selected they <br />wont be able to get their feet on the ground. And we would request that the Planning <br />Commission retain condition number 12 as previously exists in the current SMA permit <br />because as a practical matter even if you take it out and were not able to get it done in 2 <br />years were going to come back anyway. So, Id like the- to request that the Commission <br />include that time extension condition like- I think most every other SMA permit has so <br />that we are then able to petition the Planning Director for a time extension and prove to <br />him that its warranted in the next 2 years and if we fail to do that after that wed have to <br />come back to the Commission anyway. <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.