My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-03-18 TKIC
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-03-18 TKIC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:08:55 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:08:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GALDONES:Jeff, perhaps you can enlighten us the reason behind the deletion of <br />condition number 12 and the statement- how would the- would apply if we put it back in <br />as requested by Mr. Lim. <br />DARROW:Condition number 12 allows for an administrative time extension. <br />Once an administrative time extension has been exhausted then at that point the Planning <br />Director and the Planning Department are not allowing an additional administrative time <br />extension. So basically, any request for a time extension from here on would require the <br />applicant to come back before the Commission. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Fujikawa. <br />FUJIKAWA:Just going to stay like that? Just how I was reading (inaudible) <br />were not going to adjust anything? <br />GALDONES:What is before us right now is to delete paragraph- condition <br />number12. <br />FUJIKAWA:Right. <br />GALDONES:Istodeleteit. <br />FUJIKAWA:Delete it. <br />GALDONES:Yeah. That is what is before us unless the- unless the <br />Commissioners are willing to consider Mr. Lims request to have it reinstated. <br />GRAHAM:Id like to have some discussion on that if we could. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Graham. <br />GRAHAM:On the face of it- what Mr. Lim said sounds reasonable to me and I <br />wasnt quite sure that I understood Jeffs comment. Like maybe letting it in is not <br />appropriate because of the- of what were doing today or- or could the Planning <br />Department give us some understanding about why they chose to remove that condition <br />which would allow for an administrative time extension. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yuen. <br />YUEN:As a matter of standard practice weve been taking a position of- <br />your original permit has a administrative time extension then after that you have to go to <br />the Planning Commission or sometimes to the Council. Then after every time extension <br />you get you should go back to the Planning Commission or the Council. If you know the <br />applicant thinks that they cant do the project in the time period theyre being allowed on <br />a time extension- theyre pretty sure that they cant and they are going to need another <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.