Laserfiche WebLink
lineof Waikoloa Development. So if you€re going to the right-hand side there, or to the south, <br />that€s, where Jeff has his arrow, would be the closest non-Waikoloa Development property, <br />that€s State property. Then to the north,the colored areas in there, that would be Bridge, right <br />there is Bridge Ainalea, which is not currently developed but is somebody else€s property. <br />That€s the closest to the north. And then across the Queen Kaahumanu Highway, that€s also <br />Waikoloa Development property. So I don€t see the scale on that but approximately -. <br />DARROW:I would say, it€s approximately 2 inches per mile. <br />YUEN:Pardon me? <br />DARROW:Looks like it€s approximately 2 inches per mile. <br />YUEN:Okay. So, you know, approximately a mile to non-Waikoloa <br />Developmentproperty,exceptonthemakaisidewheretheresortiscloser,andso,andthereare <br />other owners within the resort. But along the highway and then on either side and mauka of the <br />property is Waikoloa Development€s. <br />GALDONES:Thank you, Mr. Yuen. Ms. Bail, a couple of questions. If there is any <br />development in the future that arises, what happens, who determines your flight plans so that it€s <br />not a nuisance to the surrounding developments? <br />CHEVALIER:We€ve traditionally worked with the community. If there€s ever a <br />complaint, if there€s ever a concern, we adjust our route to alleviate any impacts that we have on <br />on-going development. <br />GALDONES:Okay. And the other question I have is, what would the, what will <br />reducing the extension to 5 years, how would that impact your application? <br />BAIL:It just means you€ll be seeing me again in 5 years for another extension of <br />time. You know, I was hopeful that we could extend this permit for a period of 10 years, given <br />the landownership situation and the other development priorities that Waikoloa has other than <br />the immediate areas around the heliport. So I think a 10-year period would be appropriate given <br />the history of the facility. Given the current operator at the facility, I think it€s an appropriate <br />extension of time. But certainly it€s to the Commission to determine when they feel the issue <br />needs to be revisited. I would hope they would have, the Commission members would have <br />confidence in our representation that development of the areas immediately adjacent to the <br />heliport is not a priority for us within the next 10-year period. <br />GALDONES:Being that you have been there for something like 22 years now and there <br />isn€t in the Background Report, nor is it mentioned in the Recommendation regarding your <br />operation being a nuisance, so to speak, to the public and statement made by the gentleman that <br />if there is, that you folks have been working closely with the public in case there are any kind of <br />a development or if there€s some noise abatement that has to be taken care of, I personally feel <br />comfortable with the 10 years that you€re asking for. Commissioners, are there any -? <br />FUJIKAWA:I have. <br />9 <br /> <br />