My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
08-08-2022 Applicant's Concurrence to Defer Hearing
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
*Background/Recommendation Reports (June 2020-Sept 2022)
>
2022
>
2022-08-18 Leeward
>
Item #1 Kula Nei, LLC (PL-PUD-2022-000002)
>
08-08-2022 Applicant's Concurrence to Defer Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 1:21:39 PM
Creation date
8/11/2022 1:21:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 25-6-10. Criteria for granting a P.U.D. permit. A P.U.D. permit maybe granted by the <br /> commission upon finding that: <br /> (a) The construction of the project can begin and be completed within a reasonable period of <br /> time from the date of full approval. <br /> Note:This criterion has been addressed. <br /> (b) The proposed development substantially conforms to the general plan, any adopted <br /> community development plan, other adopted master plan, and if applicable, any adopted design <br /> guidelines and/or standards affecting the project area. <br /> • Note:The application makes references to applicable General Plan (GP) policies, but fails <br /> to adequately address how the proposed agricultural PUD is consistent with the Low <br /> Density Urban GP LUPAG Designation (which is meant for residential and ancillary <br /> community commercial uses, with a residential density of up to six units per acre.) <br /> Please provide further discussion on how the PUD use will be consistent with the Low <br /> Density Urban LUPAG Designation. <br /> • Note:There is a general reference to the Kona CDP and how the proposed PUD was <br /> designed to incorporate components of the Clustered Rural Subdivision. Please provide <br /> additional information on how the proposed project is consistent with the CDP re: <br /> development within the Kona Urban area and please provide additional detailed <br /> discussion how the proposed PUD it is consistent with the guidelines for a Clustered <br /> Rural Subdivision. <br /> (c)Any residential or agricultural development shall constitute an environment of sustained <br /> desirability and stability for the district that is in harmony with the character of the surrounding <br /> area, that results in an intensity of land use no higher than that otherwise <br /> specified for the district, and that maintains the standards of open space at least as high as <br /> that otherwise specified for the district in which the development occurs. <br /> • Note:The application identifies surrounding zoning and uses but does not adequately <br /> address how the proposed PUD constitutes an environment of sustained desirability and <br /> stability for the district that is in harmony with the character of the surrounding area. <br /> Please provide a more detailed discussion of the character of the surrounding area <br /> (including surrounding subdivisions and uses) and provide a more detailed discussion of <br /> how the proposed PUD is in harmony with that character. <br /> • Note;The application does discuss the intensity of land criteria, however it should be <br /> noted that the proposed 40%open space/agricultural reserve mentioned above is <br /> technically a 91" lot, so we will likely add a condition prohibiting it from future <br /> subdivision or built structures in that area. <br /> (f) The development of a harmonious, integrated whole justifies exceptions, if required, to the <br /> normal requirements of this chapter, and the contemplated arrangements or use make it <br /> desirable to apply regulations and requirements differing <br /> from those ordinarily applicable under the district regulations. <br /> • Note:The application does not address this criterion, specifically, why the requested <br /> PUD exceptions are justified vs. traditional subdivision development.The application <br /> indicates that the PUD process is necessary to achieve the proposed subdivision design <br /> but does not provide specific reasons as to why the exceptions as a whole are justified. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.