Laserfiche WebLink
GALDONES:So noted. Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:I need some clarification on the lettering. If we could go back to <br />Page 6, please? <br />GALDONES:Jeff? <br />DARROW:I know it gets confusing. Earlier we also had made an amendment <br />on the floor. On the previous Ordinance 95-51 had two G€s, so that has also been added. <br />So if you look Page 6, Condition G, which now has a new G as well, we€re going to <br />delete from the beginning of Condition G all the way through the second G through H. <br />And then beginning with Page 7, where it says, restricted covenants,‚ that€s going to be <br />the new Condition G; and then from there it€ll be re-alphabetized. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Further discussions? Hearing no discussions, Commissioners, the <br />PlanningDirectorisrecommendingafavorablerecommendation,fromthePlanning <br />Commission, be forwarded to the County Council, along with the amendments, as stated. <br />Commissioner Alameda? <br />ALAMEDA:Sorry, I had a question. <br />GALDONES:Proceed. <br />ALAMEDA:So how would we vote on a recommendation that€s not, that our <br />Applicant disagrees with? <br />GALDONES:It is the purview of the Commissioners whether to consider the <br />objections raised by the Applicant or not in the motion. <br />ALAMEDA:Cause we could approve something that they disapproved, in <br />essence. <br />GALDONES:That€s correct. It could or could not be -. The Commissioners <br />have the choice to consider the objections to be part of the recommendation and the <br />conditions, or the Commissioners can choose to accept what is being recommended by <br />the Director and not consider the objections raised by the Applicant. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Hearing no further discussions, the motion is in order. <br />Commissioner Fujikawa? <br />16 <br /> <br />