My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-03-18 TWAIKOLOA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-03-18 TWAIKOLOA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:10:50 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:10:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YUEN:I think I could do that. Condition B on Page 5, firstline, five (5) <br />years would become ten (10) years. And the discussion we had earlier, if you want to <br />amend the TIAR, that would be in C. And it would say, the second sentence there, the <br />third sentence where it starts with These improvements, itwould say, These <br />improvements together with other improvements required by the Department of Public <br />Works, and I would say, based on a current Traffic ImpactAnalysis Report, rather <br />than dated December 1989, shall be provided prior to the opening of the golf course or <br />in conjunction with final subdivision approval of the first increment, whichever occurs <br />first, or as otherwise provided, and the rest would remain the same. <br />Then Condition H, on Page 7, the underlined portion, will say, Restrictive covenants in <br />the deeds of all proposed lots within the property shall give notice that the terms of the <br />zoning ordinance prohibit the construction of a second dwelling unit, and condominium <br />property regimes on each 1-acre lot. That would be that change. <br />Then condition, Im sorry, that was G, not H. <br />GRAHAM:Mr. Yuen, could there be any problem with them not actually <br />beingdevelopedinto1-acrelotsinthefuture,sothatspecificallytyingyourthingto <br />one-acre lot could really prove troublesome even though the intent is clear? <br />YUEN:Well, if they did, if for some reason they wanted to do two-acre <br />lots and wanted to make each two-acre lot a condominium, and they followed the current <br />rules we have regarding condominiums and subdivisions, I would not have a problem <br />with that, because theyre not increasing the density. The problem that, with what, the <br />way people were using condominiums was that they were combining it with the fact that <br />you could put more than one house on a lot and then use the condominium to divide the <br />ownership and, in essence, do a subdivision without doing a subdivision. Weve plugged <br />that. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. <br />YUEN:Weve plugged that hole. So thats, that part is -. So this, saying <br />it that way I think works. <br />Then in H, the first sentence, we would say, Before final subdivision approval, applicant <br />must obtain reclassification of the RA-1a zoned area from the State Land Use <br />Commission to the Rural or Urban district. And then the remainder of the, remainder of <br />the condition will be the same. <br />GALDONES:Ms. Springer? Ms. Bail? <br />BAIL:May I just state for the record, I think that began as a discussion of <br />areas where we had agreement. And I think that is true with regard to the 10-year <br />extension of time, but I just want to make sure the record is clear my objection to the <br />remaining conditions that we just discussed. <br />15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.