My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-03-18 TPARKERSCHOOLBOARD
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-03-18 TPARKERSCHOOLBOARD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:11:27 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:11:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
way to deal with the traffic, it would be a lot easier for myself to swallow. But this kind of <br />segmentation feels, lays one uneasy about the whole thing. So Im- obviously youve had to deal <br />with the same issues, so Im just wondering how you are dealing with that issue. <br />YUEN:Well, we certainly did know and consider that there were these 2 <br />applications, and we are recommending both- approval of both of them knowing that- and with <br />expectation that both of them will go forward. We definitely- were not saying, were not <br />thinking, well, 1 is okay and put the blinders on, and the other one is okay, but the 2 of them <br />wouldnt be okay if you looked at them together. And we are recommending approval of both of <br />them. I understand it is an odd situation but there is this division between the- there are 2 entities <br />that are involved here, the School Board and the School Trust. So, and they have 2 different <br />programs and 2 different applications coming in. And Im glad that we at least have them- <br />theyre being heard together, theyre on the same agenda. We can look at them together and <br />consider the objections together. If you go ahead and hire a hearings officer, well have the same <br />hearingsofficerforthe2becausemostofthetestimonyisgoingtobeacommon-theissuesand <br />testimony will be common to- to both of them but we definitely looked at these as being together <br />and considered the impacts as well. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Commissioners, any further questions? If not, Sharon, before I excuse the <br />gentlemen, we did not get their addresses. Is it necessary for us to record their addresses? <br />NOMURA:No. <br />GALDONES:That wont be necessary- okay, gentlemen, thank you very much. <br />YUEN:And Im sorry but I- I have to go. But before I go I want- this is my last <br />meeting that Ill have with 2 Commission members, Francis Smith and Earl Fujikawa. They <br />have been great public servants during all these years with the Planning Commission. I wish I <br />was there to shake your hand at the very end of your very last meeting but since this is my only <br />chance I want to again express my thanks and appreciation for all your service over these years. <br />(applause) <br />GALDONES:Thank you, Mr. Yuen. Commissioners, we have before us a petition for <br />standing in a contested case hearing that was submitted by Linda Copman. Ms. Copman. <br />Ms. Copman you have been sworn in earlier so youre still under oath. Is there anything else you <br />would like to add onto what you have already said prior to us considering your petition? <br />COPMAN:No, I still live where I live. I think I still have a standing. <br />GALDONES:Okay. Thank you, Commissioners. Do you have any questions of <br />Ms. Copman. Commissioners, motion is in order. Oh hold on- Im sorry, back up. <br />Mr. Vitousek, do you have any comments in regards to the petition for standing? <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.