2008-03-20 TKOHALA LLC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

BOWMAN: No. TORIGOE: Do you feel at this point you can exercise independent judgment regarding the matters that are before the Commission today on this project? BOWMAN: Yes, I do. TORIGOE: Okay. Yeah, it seems to me that there isn’t anything that would prohibit Commissioner Bowman from participating at this point, particularly with the parties having stipulated to her continuing participation. RHO: Okay. With that, can we proceed with Mr. Darrow’s presentation? DARROW: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Good Morning, Members of the Planning Commission and Mr. Chairman. I’ll make it brief this morning, as this is a continued hearing on this matter. This morning we have three items relating to this particular application. Item No. 1 which is the Planning Director’s initiation for the revocation of Special Management Area Use Permit No. 379. We have Item No. 2a, which is Kohala LLC’s continued hearing on an amendment to Condition C for Change of Zone 97-102. Condition C has to do with the time to secure final subdivision approval; they are requesting a 5-year extension. And Item No. 2a (sic) which is the continued hearing on the Special Management Area Use Permit 379, again, for Condition No. 4, time to secure final subdivision approval, and again, a 5-year time extension request. At our December 12, 2007, hearing an agreement was made upon by the parties to be able to submit proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and Order as well as objections to each. These were all submitted in a timely fashion and they have been distributed to the Planning Commission. Since our last, at our last hearing on January 11, 2008, there was a motion made for Item 2a for the time extension for Change of Zone 97-102. The motion did not pass; the vote was two ayes to four noes. So all these matters were continued from these hearings. We have received some correspondences since our last hearing that I’d like to just bring to your th attention. Dated March 4 is a memorandum that was drafted by the Planning Director to the Planning Commission. This is the information that was requested of the applicant by the Planning Director. The Planning Director had requested certain items be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their information; mainly this has to do with the site preservation plan and the burial treatment plan for the property. Additionally, we’ve received a comment letter from the Department of Transportation, dated March 10, 2008; this has to do again with a clarification request from the Planning Department to the Department of Transportation, mainly for Condition No. 2 in their comment letter that they had sent previously. And lastly, we have received a correspondence from the applicant, dated March 18, 2008; and this has been distributed both through email as well as the hard copy this morning to the Planning Commission. Are there any questions? SIRACUSA: Yes. EXHIBIT A 5