My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-03-25 TBLASMAN0328
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-03-25 TBLASMAN0328
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:20:10 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:19:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:Just for clarification, at this point, do I understand the Deputy <br />Corporation Counsel correctly that heÓs recommending that thereÓd be no experts <br />qualified as experts? <br />GIFFIN:Mr. Torigoe? <br />TORIGOE:Yeah, I think, because this is an administrative hearing where strict <br />rules in evidence do not apply; and if we start drawing lines between expert testimony <br />and non-expert testimony, especially in this case, that can become very contentious and <br />could end up with you excluding certain opinions. Because if you decline somebody or <br />deny somebody expert status and they start offering opinions, then, you know somebody <br />could then argue that because heÓs not expert or sheÓs not expert, he/she should not be <br />giving opinions. And we donÓt want to get into that position. <br />GIFFIN:No. <br />TORIGOE:But we do want to allow reasonable opinions to be given in an <br />administrative hearing and we do want to have full cross-examination of those opinions. <br />SPRINGER:May I ask another question? <br />GIFFIN:Yes. <br />SPRINGER:So for consistency sake as well as the opinion the Deputy <br />Corporation Counsel has just given, again, nobody will be entered an expert witness? <br />TORIGOE:That would be my recommendation. And I think thatÓs especially <br />to protect the Intervenors because, you know, their experts probably will not have or may <br />not have the kind of academic training that some people may thin <br />expert. But, nevertheless, you know, their opinions, if theyÓre based on reasonable <br />experience and training of, thatÓs relevant, certainly it should be respected by the panel. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />GIFFIN:YouÓre welcome. Mikahala? <br />ROY:Ms. Giffin, if I understood the Corporation Counsel who expressed <br />that this would be in consideration of, in fact, IntervenorsÓ behalf, I would say that, <br />definitely, in light of the subject material being of Hawaiian heritage and culture, that <br />which the Planning Commission members, with the exception of one, do not have <br />expertise in, that you would allow cultural experts to be established for the record. ItÓs <br />clear that at stake here is the CountyÓs upholding of statutes, Hawai`i statutes, for the <br />protection of Hawaiian heritage and culture. So I would raise the idea that we would <br />have the right to have such experts qualified and our experts would not need qualification <br />in the, in the sciences that are being spoken of here. <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.