My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TVURICH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TVURICH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:27:49 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:27:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HAYASHI:Oh, okay. These are currently larger 20-acre lots owned by, I <br />believe, the Watumull Corporation; and these properties are shaded the darker green <br />colors. From a zoning standpoint, these are designated Open, the zoning for those <br />properties are Open. These other residential, excuse me, one-acre lots are zoned <br />Agricultural 1-acre by the County. <br />SIRACUSA:Second question. Does the Paradise, does Paradise Park have a <br />Community Development Plan on file with the Planning Department? <br />HAYASHI:Yes, we do have a Master Plan that was adopted by resolution by <br />the County Council, as well as the County Planning Commission. <br />SIRACUSA:And if we voted to defer this, would we be able to see anything for <br />the next meeting thats in the plan that would reference this issue, I mean, how the <br />CommunityDevelopmentPlanrelatestotherequest? <br />HAYASHI:Yes,wecanprovideyoucopiesoftheapplicablesectionsofthe <br />Master Plan relative to the Paradise Park. <br />ALAMEDA:Madam Chair? Question for Norman. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner Alameda? <br />ALAMEDA:How many parties are requesting for standing? <br />HAYASHI:There are two parties that requested for standing. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. And its our role now, youre asking us if we would take <br />upon those two parties separately or together? <br />HAYASHI:To take it separately. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:Norman, before we get into the Requests for Standing, theres <br />been, some of the correspondence we have on the Request for Standing is talking about, <br />I think, the Harlans distance from this thing being more than 500 feet. In Requests for <br />Standing, theres no rule about distance that the property needs to be? Its only, I think as <br />far as I understand its only, are they, is there need or, I forget what the word is, interest <br />distinguishable from the general public, is that correct? <br />HAYASHI:Thats correct. Theres no distance requirement. <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.