My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-07-21 Leeward Exh E (Items 3&4 Hagen-Cowell Trust PL-SLU-2022-000004 & PL-REZ-2022-000019)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2022
>
2022-07-21 Leeward Exh E (Items 3&4 Hagen-Cowell Trust PL-SLU-2022-000004 & PL-REZ-2022-000019)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2022 4:13:03 PM
Creation date
8/18/2022 4:12:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FUKE: Yes. <br /> KNOWLES: Okay, thank you. <br /> DEFRANCO: Thank you, Mr. Fuke. So, Commissioners, we are going to need to vote on these <br /> applications separately, so I'm going to need a motion, a motion for action for number 3 so that <br /> we can discuss it. <br /> KNOWLES: So move, I move that we take action on item number 3. <br /> KEKAL What is the motion? <br /> DEFRANCO: So you make it, you know, for or against or however you are going to make the <br /> motion. <br /> KNOWLES: Yes, absolutely, thank you. I move that a favorable recommendation be forwarded <br /> to the County Council on the application for State Land Use Boundary Amendment, docket <br /> number PL-SLU-2022-0000[0]4, based on the Planning Director's recommendation, which shall <br /> be adopted. <br /> DEFRANCO: Thank you. Can I have a second? <br /> DELA CRUZ: Second. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay, so now we are open for discussion. <br /> KANUHA: I don't see anything that[inaudible] <br /> — <br /> DEFRANCO: Yeah, you have to hold up your mic <br /> KNOWLES: Based on Mr. Fuke's representation, I mean I do know that this, to me the main <br /> issue and question that had come up was this traffic safety concerns and the proximity to the <br /> intersection, but it sounds like the applicant is working to resolve those issues. So presuming <br /> that those do get resolved, I don't have any concerns. <br /> DEFRANCO: I think working with the State will be a whole other level of looking at that. So <br /> they are going to have to get all of those approvals. Are there any other comments or questions <br /> that anybody wants to discuss? <br /> KANUHA: None. <br /> DEFRANCO: None, okay. So that being said, we can take a roll call vote then? So the motion <br /> on the table is an affirmative motion. <br /> 10 <br /> EXHIBIT E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.