My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TPULUWAI
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TPULUWAI
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:27:55 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:27:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
them to give me some direction to rezone the property to something else. And then we would <br />initiate that, I can initiate the rezoning, whether in fact the Council can initiate the rezoning. If <br />they put it, if they allow it with conditions that the applicant does not like, the ordinance stands <br />with those conditions. And then the applicants, of course, they cannot develop the property if it <br />doesnt pencil out for them, just like any other situation where you have requirements on the <br />zoning and the applicant, there are many situations like this where the market does not sustain it <br />and then the project just doesnt go forward. The rezoning would happen, but the time <br />extension would happen with those conditions, but perhaps the project would not get built. But <br />thats the same thing that happened in 1992. <br />But just, as I say, if they withdrew, if there were not requests for a time extension on this project, <br />it would just be sitting there with this zoning. And with this RS-10 zoning, anybody who wanted <br />to come in and do something with it would have to go through this process. Until we actually <br />initiated a rezoning to something else, they could still come in for a time extension; but it would <br />havetobeanamendmenttotheordinanceandgototheCouncil,justlikethisone. <br />SPRINGER:Atthistime,IdliketoremindusofaguidancethatthePlanningDirector <br />has given us frequently, that we should be evaluating these applications based on their merits <br />rather than the applicant whos making the application. And in terms of process, Ill be asking <br />shortly, if there is no further discussion, for a motion. The motion can come with the conditions <br />as recommended by the Planning Director or staff, or the Commission can adjust those <br />conditions themselves. So is there any further discussion? <br />IWASHITA:I -. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA:Just a clarification. I guess Ill address it to the Director. My <br />understanding then is we can go ahead and approve the request with the conditions as presented <br />in our materials and that would go on to the Council. Then if the Council adopts it with the <br />conditions, then the applicant here can decide whether or not at that time they want to go forward <br />or not; and, if not, the owner might find another developer that would be willing to go forward <br />and meet the deadlines. Is that correct? <br />YUEN:Its correct that the Council can adopt it with the conditions; and the <br />Council can adopt it with conditions that the applicant does not like. Then the applicant, or the <br />owner, or whomever can decide whether or not to go forward with the project. As far as between <br />the applicants here and the present owner as to what their contractual arrangement is and whether <br />the applicants here can get out of that contract at that time, that I have no opinion on. And I, you <br />know, naturally, I dont know. Okay. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, gentlemen. Commissioners, any further discussion on this <br />matter? Were ready for a motion then. Does anyone, may we have one? Commissioner <br />Watanabe. <br />WATANABE:Id like to move that we recommend approval of the extension as the <br />Director has recommended, inclusive of the conditions for housing, as well as fair share <br />development. <br />10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.