My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TPULUWAI
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TPULUWAI
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:27:55 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:27:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
same thing for a deceleration lane, a left-turn lane, any number of kinds of things that we <br />normally put on projects. If the project doesnt fly, we shouldnt make our requirements, we <br />shouldnt tailor our requirements based on whether the project is viable or not viable. You have <br />a standard set of requirements, you put them on the project. If its not viable with that, then the <br />project doesnt get built. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Director Yuen. Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Yes. Id just like to, for the record, say that I completely agree with the <br />statements of the Director that the developments that go forward, you know, in our community <br />should be able to pay for itself. And being new, Im not sure if this is appropriate, but Id like to, <br />I want to make it very clear on the record that these conditions should be made part of an <br />approval, if thats where were going with this; and that when its sent on to the Council it be <br />made very clear, our position, that those conditions should remain part of any approval. <br />SPRINGER:Your comments are certainly part of the record. Thank you, <br />Commissioner.CommissionerWatanabe. <br />WATANABE:Inlightofthisrecentdevelopment,Idliketodirectthequestiontothe <br />Director. Originally when I came into this meeting, I was in favor of your recommendations, <br />seeing that, okay, if theres a need for housing, etc. And Im kind of concerned that maybe we <br />would deny it and some other developer would have to go through the entire process again. Do <br />you have any new recommendations now that -? Basically what these potential buyers are saying <br />is if you attach these conditions theyll likely not going to go through with the project. But then <br />if you let them lapse then the next buyer has to go through the entire process again, and it will <br />take that much longer for it to be available for housing. You see what Im getting at? <br />YUEN:Unless she actually went and revoked the former ordinance its still a <br />matter of getting a time extension and updating it. If the decision here were completely to not <br />extend the time, if the decision of the Planning Commission was to not extend the time, or the <br />Council was to not extend the time, I would think that they would then direct us to rezone the <br />property back to something else. But as it stands, the property is zoned RS-10 but theyre not in <br />compliance with the conditions of zoning. So -. <br />WATANABE:So its just in reference to the extension and not the zoning per se, yet? <br />YUEN:Right, right. So, in other words, if this group walks away and another <br />group wants to buy it, if they were to actually drop the request for time extension and just <br />completely stop at this point, unless we went ahead to revoke the zoning which I am not, would <br />not be planning to do because the zoning is basically correct for the property for a residential <br />zoned area, the zoning is basically correct, its still available to somebody else to come and say, <br />well, wed like to develop the property, well come in for a time extension. <br />WATANABE:So then am I understanding you correctly denying the time extension <br />wont change the zoning and it wont hurt anything else? <br />YUEN:Well, if the Council denies the time extension completely, my expectation <br />is that they, what theyre saying is they dont want the property zoned RS-10; and I would expect <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.