My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TYAMADASAFARIK
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TYAMADASAFARIK
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:28:16 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:28:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Andjustasa side note, Mr. Iwashita, there was a, and it finally came to fruition, about 8 acres <br />right outside of the Pahoa area thats just, I guess, they just had their grand opening. Its call the <br />Malama Village Market Place. And theres a gas station there, theres a Subway, theres a <br />hardware store, theres a Village Market Place that is run by Foodland. That place is packed <br />every day. There is a pent up need in an underserved community. And when I look at the people <br />that are accessing that particular Pahoa Village Market Place, its primarily from the lower <br />region, or I shouldnt say the lower region but the makai region that we call Leilani Estates, <br />Nanawale, Hawaiian Beaches, Pahoa, Kalapana, Sea View Estates, Kaohe Homestead. All those <br />areas are being serviced by that particular development, but we still have an area that we call <br />Hawaiian Paradise Park, Ainaloa, Orchidland that is not being serviced. And I submit that this <br />project would provide for that particular service. So to answer your question in a round-about <br />way, Im hoping that these two areas, plus Aulii, would be considered for Urban Expansion <br />designation in the General Plan. <br />SPRINGER:Thankyou,Mr.Safarik.CommissionerSiracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:Ivehadquiteafewpeopleapproachmeaboutthisproject.Andoneof <br />the things, one of the comments that have been made repeatedly has been isnt this the first step, <br />isnt this setting the standard for strip development along Highway 130? And if we have three <br />bubbles then whats to prevent us later on from connecting the dots and making it a solid strip <br />mall all the way? How would you respond to those people? <br />SAFARIK:Thats an excellent consideration. But the whole notion of doing these <br />bubble-type Urban Expansion designation is precisely for good planning. I would respond to <br />those people that once we designate this in the General Plan as Urban Expansion, and we allow <br />those areas to be rezoned for Urban Expansion, that will serve the greater Puna community for <br />the next 25 years. In between those areas are residential homes, people are living in those homes <br />there. So I dont believe that were going to get into a strip mall issue, because a strip mall <br />would note that were not planning, were just going and building as the need arises. What Im <br />suggesting is that were directing the need for the Urban Expansion into these three areas and <br />leaving the rest of the areas that we want to keep pristine out of that quotient. I dont know if <br />that would answer your question or address the people that youve talked to, but thats how I <br />would respond to them. <br />SIRACUSA:Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Mr. Safarik. Commissioners, are there any other questions for <br />the testifier? Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:You know, Im not against the development per se. I think where I have <br />some problems is with the recommendation from the Land Use Commission where theyre <br />suggesting that this may not be the proper method of reclassifying the land use here. And in <br />light of the recent Hokulia dealings, it kind of troubles me, especially since in reviewing the <br />history in that immediate vicinity it seems as though we have been somewhat inconsistent in <br />approving or denying. Would it help you if this Commission were to even say, like recommend <br />to the Land Use that this be approved but not approve it on its own? <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.