My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TYAMADASAFARIK
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TYAMADASAFARIK
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:28:16 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:28:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SAFARIK:I dont know that the LUC, Land Use Commission, at the State level <br />would review this, because this is under 15 acres. Soits going to be primarily a County <br />function. <br />WATANABE:Okay, 205 suggested, okay. Then-. <br />SAFARIK:I think maybe what theyre referring to is, you mean, our agricultural <br />classification at the State level? <br />WATANABE:Well, what Im seeing here is from Anthony Ching, the executive director, <br />hes saying that Based on the description proposed, the proposed commercial shopping complex <br />appears to be of such magnitude and scope as to constitute a major urban use in the Agricultural <br />District. As such, we believe that establishment of the complex should be more properlysought <br />through a district boundary amendment rather than a special permit, which implies to me the <br />venueiswrong,notthattheprojectiswrong.Andinmaybeerroneouslyimpliedthatweshould <br />go back to the Land Use, but Im wondering if were taking the right process. <br />SAFARIK:I would hope that we would have, we being collectively, Council, <br />Commission, Director, community groups, would be able to identify the needs, I think, more <br />appropriate, especially in that area, than maybe relying on some of the recommendations or <br />opinions of, lets say, somebody that does not live in that region. In fact, that person, Mr. Ching, <br />lives on Oahu. Im not sure how the land use -. Director Yuen, the Land Use sent a letter of <br />recommendation on this particular project? Cause I wasnt, I didnt get a copy of that. But Im <br />not sure where or how they reviewed this project, Mr. Watanabe, so I couldnt comment. But <br />Im just hoping that we would have more of an input and more of an impact on the decision <br />based on issues on this island as opposed to the LUC. <br />WATANABE:I dont disagree with you, not in the development or the need. I just dont <br />want to wind up in a situation where we took an improper procedure and then all the decisions <br />coming to question at a later date. Thats my concern. <br />SAFARIK:I hear what youre saying. And I dont know that we all have crystal balls <br />to know of whats going to happen in the future. But I think that what we are is prudent and <br />thoughtful people, and Im hoping that we will not have any implications on this particular area. <br />And I look to the guidance of Chairwoman Springer, yourselves, our Corporation Counsel, the <br />Planning Director, to keep us out of that type of problem. <br />SPRINGER:Than you Mr. Safarik. And, Commissioner Watanabe, this discussion will <br />continue when we get to the agenda item; and, for your benefit, the record will reflect that when <br />it comes into the public record. And are there any other questions of the testifier? Any follow <br />up, Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:No. Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Mr. Safarik. <br />SAFARIK:Thank you very much. <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.