My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TLEAIRD
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TLEAIRD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:28:27 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:28:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LEAIRD-OKURA:Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Director, if you could respond to the two concerns that the applicant <br />raised regarding the fair share condition, and them being anot for profit organization, and the <br />RM-1 and RM-10 issues. <br />YUEN:Yes. The condition only requiresthat you submit the application for the <br />rezone from RM-1 to RM-10for theremainder of the property within six months and does not <br />delay the start of your project for the approval of that rezone. Am I mistaken? Theres nothing in <br />there that ties them starting their project to the approval of the rezone of the remainder? <br />DARROW:No. <br />YUEN:Okay, so thats not a problem. You can, if this change of zone goes <br />through,youcanstartonyourproject.Werejustexpectingthatyousubmittheapplicationfor <br />the change of zone from RM-1 to RM-10 for the remainder of the property within six months; <br />and then you have to, of course, follow through with that to the County Council to accept or deny <br />that. Whether its accepted or denied, you can still build the project. <br />LEAIRD-OKURA:Because Ive already consented from RM-1 to RM-10 clause, thats going <br />to require another public hearing. Because were already here with a public hearing, would that <br />be waived? I actually am all prepared. I have all five copies to apply for my RM-1 to RM-10 <br />today. <br />YUEN:I wish, this is actually an amendment to the Zoning Code that we probably <br />should make, that you can rezone to a lower density through some expedited process, whether <br />its from RM-1 to RM-10, or Ag-1 go Ag-20, or something like that. I mean, there should be no <br />problem doing that. But as it stands, I dont think there is a way to do it without going through <br />the regular process and having a public hearing. <br />LEAIRD-OKURA:Okay. Once it passes, the County Council, with flying colors, well be <br />glad to immediately apply the RM-1 to RM-10. <br />YUEN:There shouldnt be a problem with that condition. <br />On the second, on the fair share, I think we did overlook something here, in that the remainder of <br />the property would be a downzone. And its within the same TMK, right? The, its split zoned <br />now, right? <br />DARROW:Correct. <br />YUEN:Okay. <br />DARROW:Theyre doing a consolidation/resubdivision thats pending this action. <br />YUEN:Yes. But they, what I would add to the -. Typically what weve done is <br />weve deducted entitlements that they already have from the fair share. For example, if you have <br />a, say you have RS-10 zoning with no fair share on it because its old zoning and they come in <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.