My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TLEAIRD
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TLEAIRD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:28:27 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:28:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
forRS-10 zoning, we would only charge the fair share for half. Right? So what we would say <br />is, we would add a clause here that says that if the RM-1, remaining RM-1 portion of the <br />property is downzoned that the fair share on the property would be waived, because they would <br />be cutting their number of units in the end. <br />DARROW:On the, youre speaking about the next change of zone. <br />YUEN:Well, but this would apply to this change of zone. Because the fair share <br />wouldnt be owed until, Im not sure for this project what would trigger the fair share, if its a <br />final subdivision approval. <br />DARROW:Its my understanding that youre taking a portion of a larger piece of <br />property and changing the zone to RM-10 -. <br />YUEN:Yes. <br />DARROW:Foraportionofthat. <br />YUEN:Right. <br />DARROW:Thepropertyitselfisallowedoneunit,eventhoughitsalargeproperty. <br />Now that were creating a new parcel, thats allowing two additional units, thats where we came <br />up with the two additional units. <br />YUEN:But they have, on this property, they have currently the potential for 20, <br />right, under the current zoning? <br />DARROW:The, let me refer to this one here. This particular portion here is RM-1, so <br />this at this point has the potential of 20 to 25 units. This particular portion here is Ag-20, and <br />this is the portion that would be triggering the fair share to RM-10 where were getting the two <br />units. So Im not sure if theres something that happens once you consolidate these two that it <br />would somehow waive the fair share. <br />YUEN:Well, theres only, first of all, with the RM-10 on the rezone property she <br />would only get two, right? <br />DARROW:Correct. <br />YUEN:Then what Im saying is that if she ends up downzoning the existing RM-1 <br />portion shes losing 18 units off of that. So we could -. <br />DARROW:That would be a consideration. <br />YUEN:We would just say we wash the fair share because shes coming out with a <br />net downzone on the property. So that would be my condition here, it would say that if the RM- <br />1 portion of the property is subsequently downzoned to a lower density that the fair share be <br />waived on this zoned area. <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.