Laserfiche WebLink
pointing out to you because of the elevation changes, etc. -. But I did want to give you some <br />personal first-hand information about that. I think thatÓs the end of my comments. <br />I just want to be sure that thereÓs no, thereÓs going to be no blocking of this road or the <br />government road up above. ÒCause it says, well, thereÓs no traditional and customary, but those <br />are mauka-makai, ala hele, and there is one lateral one which is, in some cases, currently used for <br />that purpose. Mahalo. <br />GALDONES:Thank you very much for your participation and your com <br />Mr. Tyler. <br />TYLER:YouÓre welcome, sir. <br />GALDONES:Are there any questions of Mr. Tyler, Commissioners? <br />TYLER:Oh, Mr. Chairman, I forgot one thing. Under Condition I that was <br />proposed by Mr. Arai, it says there if the applicant uses the access, they have to do this. I donÓt <br />understand. What other access will they use if they donÓt use this access? I mean, are they going <br />to do a heliport up there or what? <br />GALDONES:Daryn, is the wording -? <br />TYLER:I mean, we always have these little caveats that come to us. How else are <br />they going to get there? <br />ARAI:If thereÓs no other way to get there except that Homestead Road to the <br />north, then they would have to provide the sight distance improvements. The passage was <br />included simply in recognition that if the applicant is able to come up with an alternative access <br />point out of, out on to the highway that avoids this intersection with the sight distance problem, <br />then the condition would not compel the applicant to provide the improvements even though <br />theyÓre not going to use it. <br />TYLER:Okay. <br />ARAI:So itÓs just optional. <br />TYLER:Thank you. I just wanted to point it out, Mr. Chairman. Thank you again. <br />GALDONES:Thank you very much. <br />YUEN:I donÓt know the feasibility but there is that other Homestead Road. It <br />may not be feasible to use it. <br />TYLER:Yeah, and thereÓs also the old government road. The way this is proposed, <br />they would have to access the old government road unless they had permission by the underlying <br />owner. And then thereÓs a gate or gates. <br />21 <br /> <br />