Laserfiche WebLink
YUEN:I donÓt know the feasibility of it but there is at least on paper another little <br />access. <br />TYLER:Okay. And that side access is significantly better, I would point out. <br />Someone asked the question. Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Thank you, Mr. Tyler. Mr. Fuke and Mr. Dusel, youÓve h <br />discussion of the testifier, from Mr. Tyler. Do you have any more comments, additional <br />comments? <br />FUKE:No, I think that most, if not all, of the concerns that he has raised have <br />been addressed by the Director and his staff. The applicant is prepared to accept all of the <br />conditions as recommended by your staff. And, unless thereÓs further questions, weÓd be more <br />than willing to answer them. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Tyler also mentioned about the wastewater situation. <br />FUKE:As we indicated earlier, the wastewater system, if his wastewater system <br />falls within the thousand foot radius, then he has to develop an enhanced wastewater system <br />which maybe an aerobic system, which is no different than like a lot of other approved <br />wastewater systems within a thousand foot of an operating well. Case in point is Big Island <br />Country Club, you know, they have an operating well right on their property. And weÓve had to, <br />the applicant has had to work together with the Department of Health in getting an aerobic <br />system; and theyÓve got an approved aerobic system. So thatÓs the system, if his system falls <br />within the radius, he would have to meet with their approval. <br />GALDONES:Thank you, Mr. Fuke. Commissioners, any further questions? <br />Commissioner Graham. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. I just have one sort of philosophical point to bring up. I <br />shouldnÓt say philosophical but about a specificity question. I remember, I learned a lot about <br />Planning Commission when Mike Luce was the Chairman. And one of the things that I think he <br />tried to do was when there were substantial issues to try to get them ironed out in the <br />Commission. So that when it came time for legislation, the issues were concrete, as opposed to <br />leaving substantial issues that the applicant needs to work this out with this or that department. <br />So it seems like this line of sight issue is a very substantial issue, so IÓm wondering if thereÓs <br />some way that either the Planning Commission or later that the Council should have this issue <br />worked out with the Public Works Department before final action is taken. ItÓs certainly not my <br />call to make, but I just want to suggest that. <br />FUKE:Mr. Chairman, if I can respond. I think that my sense is t <br />what the Director has recommended, that that is sufficient because it gets down to like a very <br />technical issue between Mr. DuselÓs engineer and the Department of Public Works. And he <br />would have to come, the applicant would have to come up with specific construction plans, you <br />know, to address this specific issue. What that plan is, I really donÓt know. But it would be <br />22 <br /> <br />