Laserfiche WebLink
subject to the review and approval of Department of Public Works; and only once thatÓs done <br />then that condition would have been complied with. <br />YUEN:As far as the philosophy, we definitely have a philosophy o <br />solve things at this stage, you know, rezoning; and we hope to have all issues dealt with and not <br />left up in the air. The reason, and thatÓs so that when the Council gets the recommendation from <br />the Planning Commission, they take that very seriously, that a lot of this has been looked at and <br />hopefully worked out at the Planning Commission stage. I donÓt look at this condition -. <br />Sometimes we would be more specific than saying to the satisfaction of Department of Public <br />Works. But the reason for not saying, for example, AASHO is tha <br />feet and you can do 330 feet, and that may be enough of an improvement in the present situation <br />that everybody is happy and that AASHO is not looking at a specific condition of adding one lot <br />to a particular roadway but looking as a generic standard for what you expect in a road that, in a <br />road intersection. So this is kind of a long answer. But I think that we are, itÓs an important <br />question. I donÓt like to just kick, when weÓre doing a rezoning, we need to look at all the issues <br />that are going to arise and not kick things off to the future, try to solve them as much as possible <br />at this stage. And IÓd look at, this condition was meant, was not meant to put a, to make it ver <br />nebulous in the future as to what was going to happen. But I donÓt think that we can really be, <br />weÓre prepared to be that much more specific right now. This is something that can be dealt with <br />a little later. <br />GALDONES:Commissioners, any further questions, comments? Are you ready to take <br />action on this? Commissioner Kubota? <br />KUBOTA:Mr. Chairman, I move that Change of Zone Application <br />REZ 03-003 be given a favorable recommendation and be forwarded to the County Council, <br />along with the Findings and Conclusions submitted by the Planning Director, as well as some <br />amendments to the Background Report. First, on page 7, changing the departmentÓs name from <br />Department of Public Works to the Department of Water Supply. T <br />amend G by referring to staff to add the standard language with the current language and <br />replacing this one sentence, ÐThe restriction prohibiting the construction of a second dwelling <br />unit may be removed by amendment of this ordinance by the County Council.Ñ Addition of a <br />new Condition I to correct the sight distance problem, and I donÓt have the language in total but <br />staff has it, and the intent is to mitigate the sight distance problem as pointed out by the <br />Department of Public Works. And the subsequent relettering of the rest of the conditions. I <br />think thatÓs it. <br />SPRINGER:Second. <br />GALDONES:It has been moved by Commissioner Kubota and seconded b <br />Commissioner Springer that the application of James B. Dusel, Change of Zone Application <br />(REZ 03-003), be given a favorable recommendation and be forwarded to the County Council, <br />along with the amendments as stated by the maker of the motion. Further discussion by the <br />Commissioners? Hearing none, Daryn. <br />23 <br /> <br />