2008-04-04 TMIRANDA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

terminated by Parker Ranch and Parker Ranch had then provided this property for him, for him to move the business. I believe it was the second or third time they had required him to move the business. Each time it had cost him significant sums of money to relocate. And then after he purchased the property he found out that, no, you can’t do a baseyard here. That made it kind of difficult. So, yes, we did bend over. I was not entirely comfortable but now that we have bent over, and he has in my mind although not fully complied, I think he is beginning to get the message. And he has also expended quite a bit of time, energy and money, you know, in attempting to put up the structure and making something that would hopefully be more aesthetically pleasing in the area. And I’d like to remind you, too, that that one acre site as I recall was in a valley, so it’s a lower lying area that’s supposedly not visible from the road because of the natural topography. I believe that with all those efforts and all of these discussions hopefully we can get this, get beyond this, and hopefully we won’t be addressing this again. But, anyway, those are my comments. It wasn’t as though I didn’t care about what the State Highway Division said. Anyone else care to make any comments at this point, or does anyone care to make a motion? DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? WATANABE: Mr. Domingo? DOMINGO: I move the additional extension of time be granted based on the Planning Director’s suggestion on the proposal, the suggested wording. WATANABE: That would include the revision to Condition No. 2 where we’re referring to a baseyard as opposed to an automotive repair society and also the revision to Condition 10 where noncompliance would require a decision to come back to the Commission with a recommendation to revoke? DOMINGO: Yes. WATANABE: Okay. So we have a motion. Do we have a second? OGATA Second. WATANABE: Okay, Shelly, thank you. Any further discussion on this issue? Mr. Darrow? DARROW: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The motion before us is to approve this special permit amendment request. Along with that we will have changes to Condition 2. Additionally Condition No. 10 it will not be Condition 10, 10(D), it will be the new Condition No. 10. All subsections are deleted. If this wording is correct, “If the applicant does not comply with conditions of the special permit within a timely manner, this matter will be brought before the Planning Commission for revocation.” Does that sound correct? WATANABE: That sounds correct. DARROW: Okay, with that, I’ll take the roll call. Commissioner Domingo? EXHIBIT A 24