My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-07 TAinaloa
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-04-07 TAinaloa
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:41:35 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:41:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
particular direction that we might worsen the situation that we are in, instead of resolving <br />this. So Id like to know the legal ramifications of whatever action that we take; and I <br />would like to make a motion that we go into Executive Session. <br />ALAMEDA:Motion made by Commissioner Galdones to go into Executive <br />Session. <br />MCCALL:Point of order, point of order. I think it would fair to let Mr. Fulks <br />have a say first before we -. <br />ALAMEDA:Sure. <br />MCCALL:Since he was one of the parties. <br />ALAMEDA:Verygood.Yes,thankyou,CommissionerMcCall. <br />GALDONES:Onething,Mr.Chair,IdliketocautiontheCommissioners,the <br />discomfort I have is some of the discussions that we may have, with additional <br />discussions with the parties, may put us in a compromising position, too. So that is the <br />discomfort I have in furthering the discussions, but Ill leave it up to the Chair and the <br />Commission . <br />ALAMEDA:Okay, further -? Commissioners, youve heard Commissioner <br />Galdones remarks on his discomfort level. Commissioner McCall, do you still feel its <br />a -? <br />MCCALL:My point would be that I feel that weve seen, weve heard from <br />two of the three parties that were involved. We need to hear from the third party. It <br />might be a good idea that the Commissioners refrain from asking any more questions, <br />just let the third party make a statement, then we go into Executive Session, then we can <br />ask questions later. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. I see a lot of heads nodding. Ill move forward with that. <br />Mr. Fulks, youd like to share any comments within our discussion? <br />FULKS:Okay. Thank you, very much. My name is Ole Fulks. Im an <br />Orchidland resident and my home abuts the proposed golf course project. Now the <br />settlement that the parties have been speaking of was agreed upon between the Planning <br />Department and the developer, Ainaloa Development. I was not a part of that settlement. <br />Id like to start out by just, you know, giving you a few numbers. Back in 92 or 94, <br />whenever it was when the permit was first granted, the developers agreed to pay around <br />$6 million for road improvements to Ainaloa Boulevard which was 3-plus miles. So that <br />would come to around $2 million a mile; and, of course, if you adjust today for inflation, <br />well, that would be like $12 million in improvements today, but --. Okay, well, since <br />then, the biggest thing that has happened is the Puna Emergency Access Road has gone <br />13EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.