My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-07 TAinaloa
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-04-07 TAinaloa
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:41:35 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:41:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
in, sometimes called the pair. Now that roadis 8 miles-plus long, and it connects not <br />only to Highway 130 but also to Highway 111; and the project is approximately in the <br />middle. So either one is good access for the golf course project. But now underthe <br />original settlement of $6 million, that would be about $800,000 per mile. It will now, <br />though, Ainaloa Development has asked to have that original $6 million reduced to $1 <br />million. That would be around $120,000 per mile. Now $800,000, you could get some <br />bit of road improvements; $120,000 per mile, well, not too much. I used to be the <br />president of the Hawaiian Acres Road Committee, so I know a little bit about what roads <br />cost. You dont get a lot of improvements for $120,000 per mile. But now the Planning <br />Department is recommending cutting that in half to $500,000. Now, that comes to <br />$60,000 per mile; $60,000 per mile isnt going to give us much road improvements on 8- <br />plus miles. <br />Now, currently, most of that roadway has no shoulders; and that means pedestrians and <br />bicyclesmustsharetheroadwithcarsandtrucks.Thereareblindhills,whichisanother <br />danger for the pedestrians and bicycles. So the roadway really does need improvements <br />for safety sake. Of course, traffic is increasing whether they do the project or not. A lot <br />of homes are being built. Theres a lot more traffic than it was 12 years ago when we <br />first came here with this. <br />Well, now, my only feeling representing the community, and loosely representing the <br />community, is that, well, we need improvements for safety on that roadway. And I know <br />that the project isnt going to generate a tremendous amount of traffic in there but the <br />traffic, the additional cars will be significant and --. <br />ALAMEDA:All right. <br />FULKS:Well, I think for the community, I dont think we can agree to <br />$60,000 per mile because its not going to give us the safety improvements that the <br />community really needs. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay, we hear you. Commissioner Watanabe, before we revisit <br />that motion -. <br />FULKS:Oh, another thing Id like to mention, too, that in this Order of <br />Remand, it mentions only some earmark for improvements to Ainaloa Boulevard; and as <br />I stated now, its not just Ainaloa Boulevard but the part that needs the improvements <br />even more is the Hawaiian Acres portion. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Thank you. Commissioner Watanabe. <br />WATANABE:Yeah, I have one question to ask Bobby Jean Leithead and that <br />would, and watch out for the liability -. Its strictly about when did the County, you <br />know, accept dedication of the road? <br />LEITHEAD-TODD:I cant recall the exact date -. <br />14EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.