My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-05 Department of Finance Real Property Tax Division Revenue Cycle Management
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
2022-05 Department of Finance Real Property Tax Division Revenue Cycle Management
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2023 3:38:53 PM
Creation date
9/14/2022 1:36:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cause and Condition <br />RPT's performance measures do not align with its stated mission or provide enough information <br />about its overall activity. <br /> <br />Effect <br />Stakeholders and decision-makers are left unable to make informed decisions. <br /> <br />Recommendation 1 <br /> <br />Key Performance Indicators <br />RPT should develop additional qualitative and quantitative key performance indicators (KPIs)for <br />each functional business area to inform stakeholders. <br /> <br />Key Performance Indicators (KPI) should identify the following: <br /> <br /> 1. Whether goals align with the vision <br /> 2. What could cause variances <br /> 3. What information RPT already has access to <br /> 4. What are unique aspects of its operations, and how should they be measured <br /> 5. How frequently will RPT measure each KPI <br /> 6. What are RPT's short, long-term goals, lagging, and leading KPIs <br /> 7. Who are the responsible parties for developing and maintaining KPIs <br /> 8. Who can benefit from this information, and how will it be shared <br /> <br />Example KPI for the collection's group: <br /> <br /> • Letters mailed resulting in a payment arrangement- A qualitative measurement of <br /> communication effectiveness. <br /> <br /> • Percentage of outbound calls resulting in a payment arrangement. —A qualitative <br /> measurement of how effective the employee is as a negotiator. <br /> <br /> • Average call handling time compared to goal —A quantitative measurement of <br /> productivity. <br /> <br /> • Lapse Time (time between calls)—A quantitative measurement of downtime <br /> productivity. <br /> <br /> • Total payment arrangments managed (month-over-month) —A quantitative <br /> measurement of trends and program effectiveness. <br /> <br />These examples are for reference only and are subject to RPT's goals, priorities, and ability to <br />access data. The list is not exhaustive. <br /> <br /> <br />19 Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.