My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-05 Department of Finance Real Property Tax Division Revenue Cycle Management
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
2022-05 Department of Finance Real Property Tax Division Revenue Cycle Management
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2023 3:38:53 PM
Creation date
9/14/2022 1:36:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Overview <br />Less than two years parcels represent the earliest stage of delinquency, with more chronically delinquent payers falling into the active category. <br /> <br />The division stated it discourages payment arrangements because the plan agreements are rarely kept. This is evidenced by the small number <br />of property owners in a payment plan, 1.2% of delinquencies by percentage, 51 parcels, totaling $485,777.63. <br /> <br />Payment arrangements are a good faith tool used to work with struggling debtors when payment-in-full isn’t an option by offering smaller, frequent, <br />and more manageable payments. The practice establishes mutual accountability between the division and taxpayer by setting expectations both <br />parties acknowledge. The process works best when based around a date where the taxpayer fulfills the tax debt obligation, also known as a satisfaction date. <br /> <br />Another essential component is monitoring and oversight. Monitoring monthly payment arrangements and those at risk of default provide closer to real-time <br />feedback than the insight a twice-per-year billing cycle can provide. RPT staff communicates by USPS mail. <br /> <br /> BENEFITS/DRAWBACKS OF TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS VS. MAILERS <br /> <br /> Advantages Disadvantages <br /> <br /> Can scale to multiple people The tone of voice is lost <br /> at one time <br /> <br />Mailers Recipients can reply at their Easier to ignore than phone calls <br /> leisure <br /> <br /> Ideal for sending simple Can use up valuable time with <br /> messages back-and-forth communication <br /> <br /> Personality and tone of voice Potential to disrupt someone's <br /> are easier to showcase workflow or schedule <br /> <br /> Ideal for relationship building Requires more skill than mass <br />Telephone mail <br /> <br /> Able to explain complex ideas Need for quiet space to conduct <br /> and establish two-way the conversation <br /> communication <br /> <br /> <br />Table 5,compiled courtesy OCA. <br /> <br />28 Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.