Laserfiche WebLink
Competing priorities of maintaining and invoicing active parcels, skip tracing new addresses on mail returns, and going to sites to post property, <br />do not leave staff time to conduct robust, proactive community outreach to resolve longstanding delinquencies. The volume of delinquencies in <br />aggregate has reached numbers that call into question whether the staff can provide quality management on each communication. <br /> <br />Table 6 assumes the division wants to work each account once per month, and collectors working these parcels can commit their full time and <br />attention to collection efforts without multitasking. <br /> <br /> <br /> County of Hawai'i <br /> 13,871 Delinquent Parcels <br /> Calculations Collector "A" Collector "B" Collector "C" <br />Divide by three employees 41624 41624 41624 <br />Divide by 4 weeks 11156 11156 11156 <br />Divide by 5 days 231 231 231 <br />Divide by 8 hours 29 29 29 <br /> <br />Divide by 60 minutes 2 accounts 2 accounts 2 accounts <br /> per minute per minute per minute <br /> Table 6,compiled courtesy OCA. <br /> <br />While RPT has a category devoted to payment arrangements, it does not have an effective <br />strategy, including income or payment matrices, an outreach strategy, or the ability to manage <br />secured monthly payments. <br /> <br />Cause and Condition <br />The RPT collection process is designed for invoicing and collecting taxes. Proactive community <br />outreach to establish, monitor, and maintain payments is not being prioritized. <br /> <br />Effect <br />RPT has an ineffective system to manage payment arrangements which cannot ensure ease of <br />access and lacks a uniform approach. <br /> <br />Recommendation 2 <br /> <br />Payment Arrangements <br />We recommend that RPT establish payment arrangements to resolve delinquent property-tax <br />debts as one of its primary activities and develop a system to ensure effective management. <br /> <br /> <br />29 Page <br />