Laserfiche WebLink
BEAUDET: IÓd like to make a motion, to move in support of the Planning DirectorÓs <br />recommendation for approval for a Use Permit 10-000019 of Paradise Retirement HawaiÒi and <br />its conditions as stated. <br /> <br />HOUSEL: Do we have a second? <br /> <br />NELSON: Second. <br /> <br />HOUSEL: Second? Commissioner Nelson. Discussion? <br /> <br />th <br />BOWMAN: Yes. In the Public WorksÓ dated March 9 Î and forgive me if it is included, but I <br />didnÓt see it Î No. 5 said, ÐAny vehicular security gate shall be set back a minimum, exclusive of <br />gate swing, of 50 feet from the County right-of-way.Ñ And I apologize for not asking the <br />applicant if they were going to put a security gate in, because if they were, I think it needs to be a <br />condition. So IÓm sorry I didnÓt do this earlier Î my bads. <br /> <br />HOUSEL: Would you care to respond? <br /> <br />CHU: Yes. Thank you for the question. The applicant didnÓt have any plans for a gate right <br />now. Do you -? He asked me if you wanted -. Did you want us to gate it? <br /> <br />BOWMAN: If it would be gated, it needs to be in compliance with this -. <br /> <br />CHU: Absolutely. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: And I donÓt know if we need to put it in. <br /> <br />CHU: ThereÓs usually a condition that we comply with all, as part of the plan approval. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: ThatÓs what I was trying to look at. I just saw this specifically. Maybe staff, you <br />can -. <br /> <br />HOUSEL: I believe if they choose to put a gate in, they have to comply with the County <br />requirements. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Okay, thank you. Just making sure. <br /> <br />HOUSEL: I still have a problem with the traffic impact. Reading on, I mean even though itÓs <br />not in the conditions, there is a sentence on Page 3, ÐThe DPW also requires the submittal of an <br />updated Traffic Impact Analysis Report as required under the Department of Public Works <br />(sic).Ñ <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: I want to point out that thatÓs actually a misstatement, and DPW has <br />withdrawn their condition of the TIAR because they were misreading the ordinance. The <br />reference from DPW says that Ðrequires submittal of an updated Traffic Impact Analysis <br />Report,Ñ but it misread the ordinance because it says that if itÓs a qualified senior housing <br />10 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />