Laserfiche WebLink
project, that that condition is not a requirement of the ordinance. And so weÓve had a contact <br />from DPW that for this project they are not requiring an updated TIAR because it is exempt <br />under the ordinance. <br /> <br />HOUSEL: Okay, thank you for the clarification. I see, okay, so thatÓs new information. Mr. <br />Darrow? Does anyone want to make any more comments? Okay, it looks like we are ready. <br /> <br />DARROW: Could I ask the Director a quick question? In light of what was just mentioned, <br />Condition 4, should that remain the same or be changed? <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Condition 4 should be removed because under the underlying ordinance <br />this project is exempt from doing an updated TIAR and we have had confirmation from DPW. <br /> <br />DARROW: Thank you, Ms. Director. <br /> <br />HOUSEL: Thank you, Mr. Darrow. So Mr. Beaudet, would you like to restate your motion? <br />Either withdraw or amend it. <br /> <br />GONZALEZ: If the maker of the motion is fine with that amendmen <br />record, and the second can state on the record, and then you make sure there are no objections <br />from the other Commissioners. <br /> <br />HOUSEL: Okay, sounds good. Is everyone in agreement with that? <br /> <br />BEAUDET: For the record I agree with the additional change of deleting Condition No. 4. <br />NELSON: IÓm okay with the change. <br />HOUSEL: Is everyone else in agreement on that? Okay. <br />DARROW: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The motion before us is to ap <br />application with the deletion of Condition 4. With that, IÓll take the roll call. Commissioner <br />Beaudet? <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Aye. <br /> <br />DARROW: Commissioner Nelson? <br /> <br />NELSON: Aye. <br /> <br />DARROW: Commissioner Bowman? <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Aye. <br /> <br />DARROW: Commissioner Giffin? <br /> <br />11 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />