2010-04-16 TKAWAIHAE - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

BOWMAN: Will the revenues Î and maybe you canÓt answer this Î will the revenues generated by this lease be spread out over the state, or would it focus more on the Big Island? K. MOORE: I canÓt answer that; thatÓs kind of a budget question and IÓm not sure. BOWMAN: Okay, thank you. HOUSEL: Mr. Moore, Bill Moore. B. MOORE: Yes. HOUSEL: Obviously, we have a lot of interest to represent here and to hopefully resolve everybodyÓs concern about this trail. Would you be willing to work with the National Park Service to put a trail through there, or Î I know you donÓt like the word ÐtrailÑ Î but a route through there? B. MOORE: We are willing to work with the -. Again, in terms of the interest here, the interest that Î and if the County wants us to work with the National Park Service, weÓre willing to Î but the interest that we really see that we need to work with in terms of a trail is the Planning Department through this permit, DLNR through Land Management and Na Ala Hele, and the adjacent landowner represented by Kawaihae Canoe Club. And again, those to me are the ones that have the interest, if we are looking at some kind of mauka-makai, or a lateral access route through here. So we are willing to work on that. And you know, we actually have, again, as I said, we have some language that we are willing to offer, that I think allows us to move ahead. ItÓs some risk because it leaves decision making with the Planning Department in terms of, ultimately, the trail improvements, but it would be in consultation with the key players. LEITHEAD TODD: Mr. Moore, ultimately, though, DLNR has to sign off on anything because they are the property owners, isnÓt that correct? K. MOORE: ThatÓs correct. B. MOORE: Yeah, in terms of the lease and the like, I think, thatÓs why in terms of the route, I mean the condition would be, you know, because again, the way that we understood the lease and the terms is all that access would have been on the adjacent property. So we are willing as a potential, as we see, to provide some of those improvements as necessary within the portion to the extent that they can be within the adjacent property, and to the extent that they are currently in the adjacent property, we want them in the adjacent property. So you know, again, and the improvements Î I wouldnÓt call them improvements even. What we are looking at on the adjacent property is that the route would be provided through just vegetation clearing and rock removal, which, again, is how that route currently through our property was created. And to the extent that a route needs to be improved to provide a safe pathway, the alignment would then move into our property and we would as part of our improvement cost would provide the safe pathway and including, and we know for sure that that would include this area right here in that northern corner. 22 EXHIBIT A