My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-04-17 TOGASAWARA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-04-17 TOGASAWARA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:50:10 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:50:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Kapoho, and the Phoa Village Road, also known as the Kea`au-Pahoa Road. The Stat <br />Department of Transportation owns the Phoa Bypass Road and also owns a portion of <br />the Kea`au-Phoa Road up to the Kahakai-Phoa-Kea`au Road intersection. The <br />remaining portion of the roadway into Phoa Village is owned by the County and under <br />the County's jurisdiction. <br />This particular property was rezoned back in 1991 to Kaneshiro and Sons. At that time, <br />the Kaneshiros wanted to construct a Food Fair Supermarket on their property. The <br />Applicant recently purchased the property from, purchased the pr <br />proposing to build a service station or gas station for eight pumps as well as a <br />convenience store on the property. <br />They are requesting that two conditions be amended. Condition C relates to the <br />imposition of curb, gutters, and sidewalks along Kahakai Boulevard and, again, Kahakai <br />Boulevard is owned by or under the County's jurisdiction. They are also requesting that <br />certain roadway improvements, including turning lanes, be deferred until the, for uses <br />other than the proposed service station. And that also goes for Condition C, to defer <br />those improvements until, and not including the, at the time of <br />proposed service station. <br />We are recommending that current Condition C regarding curbs, the imposition of or <br />installation of curb, gutters, and sidewalk be retained; and that we also, we are <br />recommending that the proposed Condition D, as proposed by the A <br />recommended for approval. So, on one hand, we are recommending that Condition C, as <br />requested by the Applicant, not be approved or not recommended for approval, and on <br />the other hand, we are recommending that Condition D, regarding <br />roadway improvements, be considered. <br />And just as, since this discussion was previously had by, on the previous application <br />regarding the timing of the development and non-compliance, there are some information <br />in the Background Report that the Planning Director at that time, back in 1996, did <br />inform the Applicant, I believe it was Kaneshiro and Sons at that time, that they would, <br />the Planning Department will initiate rezoning of the property due to non-compliance. <br />Subsequently, the Applicant did come in for a time extension. Then again back in the <br />year 2000, the early part of 2000, the County Council requested the Planning Director to <br />initiate down zoning of this property back to Agricultural-1 acre. Since that request came <br />down, the Applicant did submit another time extension request to, time extension request, <br />and that was subsequently processed. So this particular application is still classified as <br />Commercial, I mean this property is still classified as Commercial. <br />GALDONES:Commissioners, any questions of Norman? Seeing none, will the <br />Applicant or representative please step forward. Bill, could you raise your right hand. <br />Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter now before the Hawai`i County <br />Planning Commission? <br />MOORE:I do. <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.