My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-04-17 TOGASAWARA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-04-17 TOGASAWARA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:50:10 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:50:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GALDONES:Mr. Moore, could you please state your name, your resident <br />address. <br />MOORE:Yes, thank you. My name is Bill Moore. I'm a planning <br />consultant representing the owner, Paul Ogasawara, who's in the audience. My address is <br />159 Hla`i Street, Hilo 96720. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Moore, have you received a copy of the Background Report <br />and the Recommendations? <br />MOORE:Yes, we have. <br />GALDONES:Do you have any comments on them? <br />MOORE:Yes, we do. Again, we are pleased that the Planning Department <br />is recommending approval of Condition D. We do believe that the request for <br />Condition C is reasonable and ask that that be retained as requested, that the sidewalk <br />improvements be deferred for the service station. Again, we're not looking to <br />eliminate this condition, we're looking to defer it. The, again, the way the condition <br />reads, if he does anything beyond what was provided in the traffic study, then he would <br />have to put in those sidewalk improvements at that time. And, again, this is consistent <br />with the traffic study. It's also consistent with the Department of Public Works' <br />comments on this. In fact, I did meet with Department of Public Works, and got their <br />concurrence before we even submitted or prepared the application. So we went in there <br />again with the, at least concurrence of Public Works that it was reasonable to defer the <br />sidewalk improvements. <br />GALDONES:Norman, did the Department have some problems grappling with <br />the request by the Applicant for a deferral? <br />HAYASHI:Defer? <br />GALDONES:The deferral of the curbs, gutters, and sidewalk. <br />HAYASHI:We felt that just to be consistent with a previous application in <br />that area, which was the property situated across the street, that we'd like to retain the <br />curb, gutter, sidewalks for any, prior to any developing occurring on that property, or <br />simultaneously with the development of that property. <br />GALDONES:So there was another applicant in which you folks had acted upon <br />and -? <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.