Laserfiche WebLink
and Parcel 38, which has frontage on Laukapu Street. Again, it abuts the previous <br />application, which is I. Kitagawa property here dotted in red. And as I mentioned, again, <br />there were some other MCX zones that were approved in the area, as well as are still <br />pending with the County Council, which is the SAF and the Brilhante. <br />In looking at the site plan, to my right here along the right side of the map is the East <br />Kwili Street. To the top of the map is Laukapu Street. The subject two properties are <br />outlined in blue. The proposal is to have two buildings, one on <br />by a firewall. The parking will be surrounding the two buildings. And, again, with the <br />previous application on Kitagawa, the access that's proposed by the Director is to have a <br />common access, and it would be along the west boundary area. And that would be a right <br />turn-in only. The full ingress-egress would be coming off of Laukapu Street. I also want <br />to point out that our condition prohibits access from Parcel 37 due to the fact that the <br />distance from the intersection to the farthest portion of the property is in close proximity <br />and also on a slight grade. If you can, I passed out the photos, and it will show you that <br />there is about a 8- to 10-foot grade difference between these two properties, the corner lot <br />being the higher, and the Parcel 38 being a lower elevation. <br />Again, the Planning Director is recommending a favorable recommendation to the <br />County Council being that the area is designated Industrial by the LUPAG map, it's <br />consistent with the General Plan goals and policies of the Land Use Industrial and <br />Commercial goals and policies, and also it's in the transition between the Residential <br />and the Industrial area. <br />GALDONES:Commissioners, any questions of Alice? <br />KAWAHA:Mr. Chairman? <br />GALDONES:Alice. <br />KAWAHA:I do have some amendments to the condition, and one is similar <br />to the previous one, which is Condition C, the second sentence, and that would be <br />similar language. Prior to the start of construction, final plan approval for the proposed <br />development shall be secured from the Planning Director in accordance with the Zoning <br />Code. <br />Also on Condition E, the second sentence, where it reads, "A 10-foot wide (no planting <br />easement)," we should insert the words, it should read, "A 10-foot wide (no vehicular <br />access) planting screen along said Parcel 37, Laukapu Street frontage, shall be <br />delineated on the plans submitted for plan approval review." <br />GALDONES:Okay. Any other changes, Alice? <br />KAWAHA:That's it. <br />2 <br /> <br />