My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-04-17 thaks
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-04-17 thaks
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:52:33 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:52:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GALDONES:Thank you. Commissioners, any questions of Alice? <br />Commissioner Kubota. <br />KUBOTA:On Condition C, Alice, the landscape, the Haradas' concerns, <br />there was a reference to Mr. and Mrs. Harada regarding landscaping and buffers. <br />Would you point out on that map where that property is. <br />KAWAHA:I'm sorry, I may have to defer to the Applicant. I'm not too sure <br />if Harada owns the property along the northern boundary of Parcel 37 or on the west <br />side of this project site. <br />KUBOTA:Thank you. <br />KAWAHA:I'm sorry, Parcel 38. <br />KUBOTA:Okay. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Kubota, are there further questions that you had? <br />KUBOTA:Not at this point, thank you, Mr. Chair. <br />GALDONES:Okay. Hearing no further questions, will the Applicant please <br />come forward. Mr. Fuke, you have already been sworn in. Have you received the <br />Background Report and the Recommendations, and you have heard the changes as <br />recommended by Alice? <br />FUKE:Yes, we have. And Mr. Segawa, who's, Herbert Segawa, who's <br />in the audience, has had a chance to review the Staff's Background Report and the <br />Recommendation. He had the same kind of concerns as was raised earlier. We note <br />that the die is cast because you guys have made a decision on the other one. <br />But there is one other item that, you know, is peculiar only to this property that he, <br />again, would want to request consideration on. As the Staff had indicated and probably <br />you've seen the photos, there is a substantial grade difference between the two <br />properties. And, again, if I can just direct your attention to the map, the zoning map <br />again, it's in Exhibit A. The Staff's proposed condition would allow only for a right <br />turn in on Kwili Street but no exit on Laukapu Street for that first parcel. So the only <br />way that any activity or development on the, or use on that property can get out from <br />the property would have to be on the other parcel, which is like about 8 feet lower than <br />the corner property. And it's conceivable that you could make a driveway that would <br />make it possible, you know, to connect the two, but it may come at some considerable <br />expense. That, combined with the fact that, you know, these are two individual parcels <br />and what Mr. Segawa has in mind was to have separate interests operate the different <br />components of the project. And so to mandate a connection and to prohibit at the same <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.