Laserfiche WebLink
the Hawaii County Code (Erosion and Sedimentation Control) <br /> ■ The deletion of Condition J (Archaeological Survey) due to the State Historic <br /> Preservation Division's (SHPD) prior determination that"no historic properties <br /> would be affected"by the proposed four(4)-lot subdivision. <br /> ■ An amendment to Condition M (Fair Share Requirements), to clarify that the fair <br /> share requirement shall only apply to any additional lots created and to update the <br /> required fair share amounts to current rates. <br /> The non-performance on timed conditions is the result of conditions that <br /> could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicants, successors <br /> or assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence. The applicant <br /> acquired the subject property under foreclosure on May 11, 2022, with the goal of <br /> completing the proposed, four (4)-lot subdivision as envisioned by the previous owner. <br /> According to the applicant, it is unknown why the former owner could not complete the <br /> proposed subdivision within the timeframe stipulated in Ordinance No. 98 91, however, <br /> the applicant intends to complete the subdivision as represented in the original ordinance, <br /> thus the additional time to complete the subdivision is necessary. <br /> Based on the preceding, the Planning Director has determined that the non- <br /> performance by the former landowner was beyond the current applicant's control and was <br /> not the result of their fault or negligence. Furthermore, as the ordinance was approved in <br /> 1998, the Planning Director recommends updating several existing conditions to reflect <br /> current standard language and amending/adding new conditions as requested by the <br /> applicant and recommended by agencies as further discussed below. <br /> Granting of the time extension and amendments would not be contrary to the <br /> General Plan or Zoning Code. The original reasons for the approval of the change of <br /> zone are still applicable and the request is not contrary to these reasons. There have not <br /> been any significant changes to the General Plan or Zoning Code for this area since the <br /> subject rezone approval in 1998. At that time the General Plan LUPAG Map designation <br /> for the property was the same as it is today, Important Agricultural Lands. These are <br /> designated lands with better potential for sustain high agricultural yields because of soil <br /> type, climate, topography, or other factors. The A-5a zoning is compatible with this <br /> LUPAG designation. <br /> -2- <br />