Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Michael Vitousek, Chairperson <br />and Members of the Leeward Planning Commission <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />February 7, 2022 <br />E. On -site parking is maximized. <br />1. a total of 6 parking stalls can be configured within the project site; <br />2. if a van accessible ADA stall is required, then two stalls can be converted, providing <br />up to a total of 5 parking stalls; <br />F. Driveway is shown at its optimal location in order to facilitate access into and out of the <br />parking area while providing for proper parking stall configuration and providing for <br />proper interior vehicular movement, such as pulling into and out of individual parking <br />stalls; <br />G. Encroachment of garage <br />1. Outline of the encroaching garage structure is shown to demonstrate existing site <br />constraints due to the encroaching structure; <br />2. A 5-foot wide buffer was defined around this structural encroachment when <br />designing the reconfigured parking layout to ensure safe vehicular movement around <br />the encroachment; <br />H. As may be required by Planning Department Rule 17 regarding Landscaping, <br />opportunities for landscaping are being provided along all property boundaries to help <br />mitigate visual and noise impacts as may be recommended by the Planning Department <br />during the Plan Approval Review process. <br />I. 10-foot wide future road widening along the subject property's entire Hoea Road frontage <br />presented as proposed Condition B within the Planning Director's Recommendation. <br />IL Assessment of potential uses and limitations based on proposed CV-7.5 zoning <br />The Leeward Planning Commission, at its December 16, 2021 meeting to defer this <br />matter to a future meeting, requested an analysis of graduated conditions based on the <br />feasible proposed land uses that could be established on the property with the requested <br />CV-7.5 zoning. While we find this task exceptionally difficult given the 49 classes of uses <br />permitted within the CV zoning district, the Applicant provides its best attempt in the <br />discussion below: <br />A. Re ug latory Framework affecting subject property based on requested CV-7-5 zoning <br />1. Maximum Height within CV -zoning district (§25-5-123, HCC) <br />a. 35 feet for any permitted structure <br />2. Minimum Yard Setbacks within CV -zoning districts (§25-5-126, HCC) <br />a. Front or rear yards, 15 feet as determined by the Planning Department <br />