2008-04-18 TKOHALA LLC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

TORIGOE: Well, Mr. Chair, basically it says that the applicant – or in this case the Director – may, within 10 calendar days after receipt of notice of the denial – that is, you know, considered as denied denial – then within 10 calendar days of that he can request reconsideration of that decision. Upon such request, the Department shall place the application on the agenda for its reconsideration at the next meeting. And then if you fail to render a decision by a majority vote at the next meeting, then it’s considered as denied. WATANABE: Yeah, but then you have a double negative. TORIGOE: Well, that’s -. WATANABE: We’ll be voting for revocation, which is a negative, and then you get, you know – I may be jumping ahead, you may be able to get the votes – but if we are unable to achieve the votes, then we have a double negative. Then what does that mean? We are back to where we are. TORIGOE: Yeah, well, it puts you back in the status quo, basically. WATANABE: So because -, okay, now, because Mr. Lim has not agreed to this, then so I guess formally you should within 10 calendar days make the request, and then we can agendize your revocation for the upcoming West Hawaii Commission meeting. Is that correct? YUEN: Yes. Actually, the 10 days would refer to the formal notice from the Department to the Director of the -. WATANABE: Yeah, okay -. YUEN: Actually, there is a letter that the Commission signs that states what the action is, and then from that point the Director would have 10 days to request their reconsideration, and then at the next meeting following that the request would be agendized. I believe the time frame is such that that would be the next – the agenda has gone out, I believe, th for the May 8 meeting, and the 10 days, of course, if we are being very technical about this, the 10 days have not started to run yet – but they would be then agendized for the June, I mean, May nd – what is the – May 22 meeting, yes. WATANABE: Okay. Mr. Iwashita, you had some comments? IWASHITA: I’m trying to understand. So we are finished with the 90 days? Is that basically where we are? And we have no decision; so it’s basically a negative decision? Is that where we are? WATANABE: No, I don’t believe so; we only had the first vote on this. They agreed to extend. So actually, what we are saying is we get to vote on this one more time at the June (sic) West Hawaii meeting and that is only in regard to Agenda Item No. 3, the Director initiated revocation. The applicant has already conceded that they forfeit their opportunity to ask for another vote on Agenda Items 1 and 2. So 1 continues to the Council and No. 2 is dead. EXHIBIT A 29