Laserfiche WebLink
IWASHITA: I guess I’m not understanding. As to 1, that’s the zoning matter; so we are <br />advisory, that goes to Council. I see -. <br />WATANABE: I’m really sorry. Can we take a recess? I really got one urgent -. <br />IWASHITA: Sure. Fine. <br />WATANABE: Please. Let’s take a 5-minute recess. <br />RECESSED The Chair called a recess at 11:02 a.m. <br />RECONVENED The meeting reconvened at 11:20 a.m. <br />WATANABE: Will the Planning Commission meeting please come back to order again. <br />Thank you for allowing me to have that recess. Well, Mr. Torigoe and Mr. Yuen, have we <br />ironed out the procedural issues? And what is the conclusion? Either one. <br />TORIGOE: Thank you, Mr. Chair. <br />WATANABE: Okay, Mr. Torigoe. <br />TORIGOE: It’s pretty clear that at this point with respect to the Planning Director’s <br />request for revocation, that today you were unable to come up with five votes either way on that. <br />The time period for the initial decision has elapsed and there was no further request for extension <br />of time. So we are in basically 9-11 F. 3, which talks about reconsideration. And within 10 <br />calendar days after the Director gets receipt of the notice of the denial, then he can request <br />reconsideration and it will come up on the agenda at your next meeting after that. Then if you <br />fail to render a decision at the next meeting, then the request is considered as denied. <br />WATANABE: Okay. So then if it fails, the revocation is considered denied? <br />TORIGOE: Right, at the next meeting. <br />WATANABE: Okay. But of course, this is jumping ahead, right? So, and I may have <br />misspoke earlier; I think I did mention June, but this would be in reference to the May meeting in <br />West Hawaii that we would be addressing this, if the Director so decides. Yes, Mr. Woodward. <br />WOODWARD: Mr. Chairman, I had a question for Mr. Torigoe. We had two motions that <br />were 180 degrees opposite; one was to approve the time extension and the other was the <br />Director’s proposal to revoke the SMA Permit. Now, the fact that the time extension didn’t pass <br />and the Director’s initiative to revoke the SMA Permit also didn’t pass, are those two both going <br />to come back? Or are we just dealing with the Director’s initiative to revoke? <br />TORIGOE: Mr. Chairman. Thank you. I understand that the applicant, Kohala LLC, <br />has waived their right to ask for further reconsideration of this matter; so that will not be coming <br />EXHIBIT A <br />30 <br /> <br />