2022-08-18 Leeward Exh B (Items 4 Meneghetti PL-SMA-2022-000017)

Home

DEFRANCO: But if, you know, I didn't go out and look at the site, but you did, and when you look at the site, are you looking at rock? Most of the thing, you said you saw ROY: Yeah, I kind of kicked around, and I didn't want to go trapsing all over, so I came down the wall, went down in there and was kicking around down to the bedrock, the pahoehoe lava. And they had said about five inches and some places it was only a few inches of really kind of what I would look to be garbage material, mix of gravel, you know, construction, some sand. But the other thing, too, is that the development is going to be set back DEFRANCO: From that section. ROY: —from that wall, so that corner will, there may be some minor landscaping, but there is going to be no actual building or construction really DEFRANCO: In that area. ROY: within about 20 feet of that wall, so that corner DEFRANCO: And that's the questionable area. ROY: I don't know if that encompasses the corner of the whole area that, you know, that he is talking about, but he may be able to speak to that. PAISHON-DUARTE: May I also just add? VITOUSEK: Sure. PAISHON-DUARTE: Part of the reason why I'm advocating for additional soil deposit testing is because of the statement that was made, is that because of the adjacent properties that did not, was not required to undergo this type of assessment, I think it just could, it would be good to do this. KNOWLES: And it doesn't have to be as restricted, I mean that the condition that you read out was fairly expansive in terms of the, I think it said the entire construction phase ROY: Yeah, during KNOWLES: theoretically, we could limit it, I imagine, to the grading and VITOUSEK: Yes, yes KNOWLES: foundational work. VITOUSEK: And I think there are two separate issues, right? I think that Commissioner Paishon-Duarte is asking about, one, archaeological monitor and, two, archaeological testing. 14 EXHIBIT B