My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-08-18 Leeward Exh B (Items 4 Meneghetti PL-SMA-2022-000017)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2022
>
2022-08-18 Leeward Exh B (Items 4 Meneghetti PL-SMA-2022-000017)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 12:30:29 PM
Creation date
10/25/2022 12:30:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
mean our thing is to make sure that, you know, it is being done correctly, right? And for some <br /> reason—yes? <br /> ROY: I just wanted to add that at a minimum this would add two, two more months, if not more, <br /> because SHPD it's 30 to 45 days, and then to schedule it before the Commission again, so <br /> DEFRANCO: Right— <br /> ROY: just,just to give you some <br /> DEFRANCO: but in my mind, too, there has already been SMAs on this property, like, many <br /> of them, right? They don't mean anything anymore? You know so much more about <br /> archaeological things, but it seems like this property and this whole subdivision has already had <br /> SMAs done, right? And so this one, because the law changed, right, in 2020 or something, we <br /> have a new law, so now we have one more level of stuff to make sure that everything is being <br /> done correctly. That's the reason for the law. So the other reason is for the applicant to stand up <br /> to that and say we want to be reasonable, we are willing to supply an archaeological person to be <br /> on site to look at everything so we can go forward, and we don't get a two to four months, six <br /> months, delay. Am I hearing this right? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yes, so in this case if you are recommending an archaeological monitor <br /> DEFRANCO: Yes. <br /> VIOTUSEK: Then that archaeological monitoring report has to go to SHPD for review. SHPD <br /> is probably not going to review it if they didn't request the archaeological monitoring report, <br /> because there has been no initiation of the 6E-42 process, which triggers the historic preservation <br /> review. So for us to just say do a monitor and send it to SHPD, they are going to be like what's <br /> this, you never sent us the permit on this. So <br /> DEFRANCO: So the reason the permit was in the first place not sent by the County to SHPD is <br /> because you went out there and looked at it and didn't feel it was required because of the <br /> topography of the land. <br /> ROY: Well, the historic activities <br /> DEFRANCO: And, and all of the activities that's already been done <br /> ROY: the four SMA permits that have been conducted <br /> DEFRANCO: The four done before <br /> ROY: yeah, on this property. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay. <br /> 19 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.