My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-08-18 Leeward Exh B (Items 4 Meneghetti PL-SMA-2022-000017)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2022
>
2022-08-18 Leeward Exh B (Items 4 Meneghetti PL-SMA-2022-000017)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 12:30:29 PM
Creation date
10/25/2022 12:30:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KNOWLES: Chair, is there a way to do an if-then kind of a condition? You know, the idea of <br /> having it hang out there with SHPD. And so since we would be approving the permit today with <br /> these conditions, if then, unless something is triggered for SHPD, that then would bounce it back <br /> to us. I'm just curious. I'm still new to this process, but I'm wondering if there is a way to do an <br /> if-then. And so if there is nothing, it just rolls along; if there is something, it kicks back to us. <br /> ROY: Well, there is the standard SHPD condition that is for every, well, it's <br /> VITOUSEK: Which would, the inadvertent discovery condition, yes, yes. But I think in this <br /> case we are talking about, again, the two options about whether 6E-42 compliance be a condition <br /> of this or whether that be done in advance of our approval of the application. So to me, it's got <br /> to be done one way or the other. And it's for us to decide whether we condition that or we ask <br /> them to do it and come back. Either way, this adds time, because either way I think this has to be <br /> done, you know, they have to do a 6E-42 review of this project in my opinion. Yes. <br /> DARROW: So, again, that's your you've explained very well what the two options are the <br /> option that the applicant does not need to appear back before the Commission, normally what <br /> happens is we place a condition. In this particular situation, it's a little bit more unique because <br /> Planning would send the application through HICRIS, and they would respond to Planning and <br /> also whoever the contact is. So the condition would be, the permit would be issued, but in the <br /> conditions, it would say that the applicant could not submit for a building permit until this <br /> process is complete. And so if SHPD comes back and says, you know, issues a no-effect letter, <br /> then at that point, they could proceed. If they come back and say we want an AIS, they would <br /> have to an AIS and comply with whatever requirements, or whatever they would say, they would <br /> be held based on that condition to comply with whatever requirements are requested by SHPD. <br /> So, again, that's the two options; either they come back after SHPD responds and then you folks <br /> decide what you want to do there, or you give the ability for SHPD to respond, and they comply <br /> with whatever they want. And again, you still can request an on-site archaeologist monitor to be <br /> there. <br /> JACKSON: Mr. Chair? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yes. <br /> JACKSON: May I suggest we take about a 10-minute recess to crack some language and then <br /> bring it back to the Commission <br /> VITOUSEK: Sure, no problem. <br /> JACKSON: to achieve the objective? <br /> VITOUSEK: Sure. <br /> JACKSON: Okay. <br /> 20 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.