My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-21 Tgp-amendment
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-04-21 Tgp-amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:56:07 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:56:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
My property actually sits on Napoopoo Road and Makahiki Lane. Ive had 3 accidents. One hit the end of a <br />rock wall. One went airborne into my property and another one took out the utility poles and all the water <br />(inaudible). This is in a 20 mile posted speed limit. This is possibly one of the worst designs Ive seen on a <br />really dangerous road is to increase the density by going Rural. And this particular developer that owns the <br />property will certainly do that. Thank you very much. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Any questions for our testifier? Appreciate your testimony, you may <br />be seated. Margaret? <br />WILLE:Yes. Margaret Wille. 65-1316 Lihipali Road, Kamuela. And Im not going to <br />repeat last, Hilo hearings I spoke about the need to retain the County mandate to construct the connector <br />road mini-bypass in Waimea. Following my testimony Director Yuen made a comment that sort of <br />prompted me to think about returning and that had to do with the maps and the importance of if there might <br />be a request for funding for a road that its important to have that road on the General Plan maps. And <br />maybe could you put on F-5 map on the- possibly? <br />ALAMEDA:Sure. <br />WILLE:If you dont mind. This road that is currently, theres $400,000 being spent on a <br />environmental assessment. And it was on the CIP list for 05/06 is off the map. And when I asked <br />Director Yuen about the, in a phone conversation, he said that really wasntintentional trying to omit it and I <br />did not bring this up at the last meeting. But since he indicated that it is important to have-. If you look at, in <br />the materials that I gave out, just theplans showing the map, showing the location. So, its hard to look at <br />that plan but this road is not on that map. And consistent with the text if you retain the text here its even a <br />specific course of action for consistency and just in terms of the possibility of additional funding I would ask <br />that this be included on that map and the larger map that these are sections of. I did want to make a couple <br />points but very short. Just in terms on notice on these different amendments I know theres a provision in <br />the General Plan for if a particular party wants the Director to include a, its on page 337 of the General <br />Plan, how they go about making a specific request and which requires that they explain why and they pay a <br />fee. And it would help to do that, I just encourage in doing that type of process where that other developer <br />or in this case Parker Ranch made a specific request and our community-. I just happened to bump into that <br />this was in here so that the communities that are affectedcould more readilyfind out that something is going <br />on. And really (inaudible). Currently on this connector road one of the big issues is really to what extent the <br />County is now going to require Parker Ranch to comply with its road concurrency requirement. And I <br />appreciated your discussion earlier today about Seascape because I feel like a discussion like that had gone <br />on in 1996 the community, Waimea, would not be in the position its in right now where originally Parker <br />Ranch was to put in the entire portion of its connector road. It then came in and asked for an <br />accommodation to only do that in incremental phases. Not one inch of this road has been put in. They have <br />now sold parcels along that who are now coming in objecting to the road. And Director Yuen now has <br />before him their request to further eliminate what is in that ordinance. So, I wish you would have had that <br />discussionherebeforeyouallwhatsgoingon,onthissoyouseewhathappensaftertheaftereffect.Justa <br />last thing I included, so I included my, a letter I wrote to the Mayor on this, that issue. And I also just as <br />backgroundforBobHuntersdiscussiononprotectingthepuusputinabackgroundmemooftheLand <br />Conservation sub-committee and our work in trying to get the community to work on that proposal. Lastly <br />oneofthepointsintheGeneralPlanis,talksaboutisthewaytheresnozoningorconservationzoningthat <br />would allow sort of multi, multi-faceted uses where you could have agriculture conservation, Hawaiian <br />EXHIBIT D <br />10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.