My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-21 Tgp-amendment
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-04-21 Tgp-amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:56:07 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:56:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:Thank you. Any questions? Thank you very much you may be seated. Maam <br />could you please state your name and address for the record? <br />FORD:My name is Brenda Ford. My address is 81-950 Makahiki Lane, Captain Cook <br />Holding. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay Brenda. <br />FORD:Im here to talk about the same map, I have several concerns on it. The first one is <br />since youre making those changes I think its just appropriate that the resort of Hokulia be stricken out since <br />its been removed legally by the Judge. With the spot zoning, its good to clear spot zoning and yet I see <br />nothing in here that says that it will be removed. I think its time we started complying with court rules in <br />this County. Secondly I wanted to talk about the same section of the map Ambika talked about. Id like to <br />reiterate a couple of things it is an SMA area. There are 2 full channels in it. This property has been divided <br />by the owner. My husband and I live in the subdivision directly and adjacent north of this subdivision. Our <br />subdivision was designed by the same developer. There are a lot of problems but Im not going to go into <br />today by that developer. But given this a Rural designation is asking for this developer to do develop this <br />into half-acre lots. The problem with developing half-acre lots is youre sitting right above marine sanctuary <br />that has already had four channels carved in it and those are indicating 100-year flood channels that drop <br />from the right hand side of the map, thats the mauka side onto to the makai side, onto Mr. Moris <br />conservation land, onto the State land and over the edge of the pali. Not only that but this entire area that sits <br />above here, sitting on top the aquifer. If you were to look at a hydraulic, a hydrologic map of the runoff <br />from the mountains to the sea, right under the Captain Cook monument and at the south end of the point of <br />Kealakekua Bay there are huge rivers. Im not talking little streams Im talking rivers of fresh water leaving <br />the island, two huge ones that show up on the infrared maps extremely well. And theres tapes that you <br />could ask George Wilkins of the Water Board to provide you for extra information. There is a underground <br />dike that is holding back the water and were all sitting on top of it. Those of us who has been there for a <br />while are using cesspools. Now those have been outlawed and you can only use in a new construction, <br />septic systems. But the more population, the more houses that you put on top of this pali, the more youre <br />going to have sewage coming into the aquifer itself and extending out into the bay. The housing right along <br />the bay shore itself are using cesspools. So anything that has a cesspool that sits on that bay is leaching into <br />the bay at this time. This is a dolphin sanctuary, they come in and sleep during the day. Its also a very <br />highly used tourist attraction. Another problem with the whole situation is not just the half-acre lots, which <br />would increase full fold the number of houses that would go in there is that it will also increase the traffic on <br />Napoopoo Road. Regarding the subdivision that is owned by Mr. Mori that will be going in here while Im <br />not objecting to the subdivision itself because thats already been passed in 1991, 1987 something like that. <br />I have (inaudible) 10 pages of documentation on poor engineering that was proposed for the subdivision. <br />And the engineering is going to impact these flood channels. And its going to impact the property owners <br />of, the future property owners that buy this land. Its very important that this Commission understand and <br />accept the totality of the infrastructure that we have today in this area. The bad traffic that we have and this <br />propertyneedstobenothigherdensitybutnohigherthanitscurrentlypermittedforwhichisatotalof37 <br />lots between this entire subdivision. The totality of this subdivision needs to consider the traffic. With 33 <br />lotsonthenorthernhalfofthislandand4lotsonthesouthendyourelookingatapproximately74cars <br />minimum coming on the Napoopoo. A very busy road that is speed posted at 20 to 25 miles per hour, the <br />averagespeedis45to50milesanhour.Ivehadthepoliceouttheremanytimesjuststandingbytheroad <br />and in horror at the amount of traffic going through there. So we need to have a lot of traffic work in there. <br />EXHIBIT D <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.