My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-21 TSeascape-development
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-04-21 TSeascape-development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:58:09 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:58:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:I agree with the Planning Directors sense that were really micro- <br />managing something here is maybe not appropriate. And I guess after listening to all of this I <br />dont feel like I can kind of jump ship and say yeah if youre ready just write Ill go along with <br />it. I feel like you know Commissioner Iwashita said we do have this letter from the Police <br />Department that maybe you know if this is not granted the applicant could go to the Police <br />Department and say well they do have the condition we need to build this. We will put up the <br />barricades as you indicate and we expect that youll give us the cooperation and we feel theres <br />no public nuisance and problems here and let it go at that. I just dont see a way out of the basic <br />issue of what will happen years in the future by us writing whole bunch of verbiage now. So I <br />just cannot support it even though I have good feeling for the intentions. <br />ALAMEDA:FellowCommissionersasyoutakenoticetheresonly5ofusandhearing <br />the comments from Commissioner Graham we can continue this discussion or we could move <br />forward via motion. Whats your pleasure? Corp Counsel any comment? <br />TORIGOE:Thank you. Mr. Chairman I just-. One last try at this. One way of adding <br />something to try and satisfy some of the concerns about security would be to throw (inaudible) at <br />the end of the proposed amendments to Condition G. Something like, the covenants shall <br />include an obligation to allow the County to foreclose upon the property to satisfy cost of <br />building the road under public procure and procedures as may be determined by the Director of <br />Public Works, that sort of thing. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioners any response to that? Seeing none? <br />WATANABE:Mr. Graham is the one that-? <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Graham would you care to respond? You dont need to if you dont <br />want to. <br />GRAHAM:Im sure the Council is going to deal with this however they deal with it <br />and I dont have anything. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay, thank you Commissioner Graham. Fellow Commissioners? <br />Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE:I move that a favorable recommendation be submitted to the Council for <br />amendment to Condition H as further amended during these discussions for Change of Zone <br />Ordinance 04-106, REZ 1047. <br />ALAMEDA:Motion made by Commissioner Watanabe. Is there a second? <br />GALDONES:Second. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.