My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-21 TSeascape-development
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-04-21 TSeascape-development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:58:09 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:58:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:Seconded by Commissioner Galdones. Any further discussion? <br />Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Just clarification. Does Commissioner Watanabes motion include the <br />language just suggested by Corp Counsel as an amendment or is it just based on the straight <br />unamended proposed conditions? <br />WATANABE:As amended by Corp Counsel. <br />IWASHITA:Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Any further discussion? All right Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:This is just a procedural concern. It appears to me that you know given <br />wherewearetodayandtheopinionsexpressedbytheCommissionersthatatbestwerereally <br />not going to have a decision this afternoon. So, I dont want to try and predict the future but if <br />that appears to be the case then I guess consideration should be made to whether the applicant <br />wants to have the matter continued so that the Commission can hear it at another time when there <br />are more members here. <br />ALAMEDA:I think weve had a little discussion on this previous. I dont know if our <br />Commission all of our Commission members feel comfortable giving the applicant an <br />opportunity. Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:I just was thinking, like I, you know I cant feel good supporting it but I <br />sure dont want to hold it up since a decisions going to be made at the Council anyway. And I <br />remember at a prior meeting the Planning Director suggested something about-, and this was in <br />regard to the Subdivision Code that we could sort of send it forward to the Council with just a <br />record of our vote, which you know I didnt support in that instance but I would certainly support <br />that in this instance if we wanted to do something like that then move it forward. In other words <br />if we cant give a- because of not having a big quorum here, if we cant give a clean vote on it <br />Im certainly willing to pass it up to the Council with the vote that we have if thats suitable to <br />the, to our Counsel here Mr. Torigoe, if he feels like thats appropriate? <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Torigoe any comment? <br />TORIGOE:Thank you Mr. Chairman. Well basically under the zoning code 25-, lets <br />see where is it? 25-2-44B, it says the changes or alterations of conditions are processed in the <br />same manner as a zone change. And then the zone change, and theres a 90-day window you <br />know and weve been talking about you know when we feel like its the obligation of the <br />Commission to wrestle with these matters within that 90-day window to see if something <br />intelligent can be sent up to the County Council rather than just kind of default and say that we <br />cant make a decision. And I dont know where we are in the 90-day window now. Maybe Staff <br />can enlighten us on that. But basically if it fails, if you fail to take any action today and were <br />still within the 90-day window you know it could still reappear on the agenda. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.