My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-22 TInnovations
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-22 TInnovations
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:08:03 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:07:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
traffic getting-on and getting-off. And that is a big part of the problem that what goes on with <br />Queen K Highway so thats the key I think more than any additional traffic on the highway. <br />When we look at the traffic flow in the impact report the traffic flow is really bad and slow you <br />know like from- I think its 7:15 to 8:30 in the morning. And so my first thought was maybe <br />different hours of operation would be helpful in some way but I kind of I can feel it cuts two <br />ways. If the traffic is slow then it seems much safer getting in and out even though maybe <br />youre holding things up a little. If the traffic is fast then it seems a little more dangerous getting <br />in and out. Do you see any way that hours of operation is of value to deal with on this <br />application? <br />GIMPEL:We didnt discuss hours of operation on purpose for- that was one of the <br />reasons. In my mind that obviously the slower the traffic the fewer the accidents or at least the <br />less serious the accident that might result. What our concern is, is that the right-in, right-out only <br />will require cars to, that want to go back the other way or approaching from the north to go <br />aroundandthenmakeanextratripsomewhereonsidestreetsineffect.Someonemightbe <br />trying to u-turn somewhere which is not a good idea but even if they go throughout that were <br />suggesting on Nani Kailua and then around it creates more opportunity for accidents. Going <br />down Nani Kailua Drive through the Pines, thats a semi-residential neighborhood anyway so I <br />dont think its unnecessarily a good idea to- unnecessarily add traffic there. Id much rather <br />have it go to signalized intersection at Nani Kailua, go mauka one block or so and then go to <br />Welo Street and right into the school. <br />GRAHAM:When Bill was talking about that turnaround issue both coming one <br />direction and coming the other, the one turnaround way which seemed rather benign would be <br />for parents who drop off kids and want to go back south afterwards so they can come out, go to <br />the Nani Kailua intersection, shoulder left across and come back and do a merge. One thing <br />came to my mind then, given 120 students and its going to be starting school and any school a <br />certain time of day, is that left turn lane at Nani Kailua Drive long enough to handle the amount <br />of traffic thats going to want to stack up there and wait for the light? <br />GIMPEL:It channelized now. <br />GRAHAM:Is it long enough for all this channelized? <br />GIMPEL:Im not a traffic engineer so I cant tell you its long enough but my sense <br />is that that isnt a serious concern with regard to the number of cars that will be wanting to make <br />that left turn. Im not sure. It may well be that many of the cars that are coming from the south <br />will continue to go north after that. I dont know. We dont know and- <br />GRAHAM:Like go shopping after school or something like that, yeah. <br />GIMPEL:Go shopping after school or going to work when they drop the kids off, I <br />dont know. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. Thank you. <br />22 <br />EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.