My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-22 TUmphrey REZ 03-032
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-22 TUmphrey REZ 03-032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 2:08:18 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 2:08:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GALDONES:Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Thank you. As I stated earlier, because of the uncertainty of the timing of <br />when this zoning would actually take place, if it ever did take place in the future and the fact that <br />with the Community Development Plans that are going to be worked on in the next year or so <br />and adopted by law by the County Council as part of the General Plan process that it seems to <br />me counter productive or at least creating a gray area. If we send this on for favorable <br />recommendation and the County Council adopts it that now we have conditions in place under, <br />essentially at the time it comes into effect, will be old law and that the changes that may occur <br />under the community development plan process will be run up against a legal dam on this <br />particular project because it really couldnt be implemented. So, I think its better procedure and <br />policy for us to not give a favorable recommendation on this project since there are so many <br />uncertainties time-wise as to when or if it ever will take place and allow our planning process to <br />go forward and in the future if the owner wants to come forward with a project that conforms to <br />those new laws whether they be design changes to zoning ordinance and building codes and so <br />forth and the community development plan that it can be done on that basis. Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yuen. <br />YUEN:I just wanted to say a couple of things on issues that came up because I <br />said earlier that I want to discuss the question of passing it with conditions versus saying no for <br />now and I also wanted to talk about the Community Development Plans. <br />I dont want us to be in a position where we are, in effect, having a moratorium while the <br />Community Development Plans are being prepared. That could- first of all the Community <br />Development Plans are probably about a 2-year process to get that done. I also, on this zoning in <br />particular, I doubt that the Community Development Plan would tell us much that was that <br />specific to this site. Its still, although a Community Development Plan is at a more specific, less <br />general level than the General Plan, I dont think were going to get into a lot by lot sort of <br />planning thats going to tell you this lot should be- this half acre lot here, which is what this is, <br />should be commercial. This half acre lot should be a multi-family building. This lot should be a <br />gas station. There may be that in a very confined area but I just dont think thats where the <br />plan- the plan is going to tell you that much more for- thats going to change the decision that <br />one would make for an application like this. It may be that there is an application that we would <br />say, well maybe we should wait for a community development plan for that but Id really, on the <br />scale of this application I, thats my sense of that. On the more general question ways of waiting <br />and rejecting versus passing with these conditions- people do come in with applications and then, <br />Im just raising the practical aspect of this. And then the Department works up the application. <br />We look at it. We dont- we try not to pre-judge them. At the end of the day and in looking at <br />this application, we have a lot of concerns about the access and so we put these conditions in. <br />Its likely, if you reject it and tell them to come back. Some day they will come back and we <br />will go through the same process again very likely. So thats my concern about- and one <br />practical for passing with conditions rather than saying no just wait and come back in 3 years or <br />so when some of these other things have hopefully been solved. It does result in approval but <br />cannot be implemented right away. That is a down side to it and its a downside much more for <br />14 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.