|
GALDONES:Ms. Cazimero, for the record, can you just give us your name and
<br />your address, please.
<br />CAZIMERO:Maxine Medeiros Cazimero, 52229 Government Road, Niulii,
<br />North Kohala.
<br />GALDONES:Thank you, Ms. Cazimero. Do you wish to add anything further to
<br />your testimony?
<br />CAZIMERO:Yeah. Like how I said earlier, that is new to us. A lot of our
<br />oppose, what we oppose is not her doing, she has a right to do, you know, build on her
<br />property. It’s what she’s going, the how she’s, three buildings, you know, this is where
<br />we, we’re against the thought of like three buildings. If we had a chance to look at that,
<br />we may approach this differently, I would. I cannot speak for everybody, but I would
<br />approach this differently probably. You know, a one with her, for whatever her plans on
<br />her yard work would fall into one building, I wouldn’t oppose it as much as three ugly
<br />buildings -.
<br />GALDONES:Thank you, Ms. Cazimero.
<br />CAZMERO:In front of my bedroom.
<br />MCCALL:Mr. Chairman?
<br />GALDONES:Commissioner McCall?
<br />MCCALL:Maybe if I would make a comment. I don’t know whether it would
<br />be appropriate, we have already given standing to Ms. Labisores, but if it’s appropriate
<br />and -. To Malama, would it be, what I’m proposing is that maybe you go back talk to the
<br />community, talk to these people, see if you can work out something, rather than push this
<br />straight into a contested case. Let’s take a month, see if you guys can work this out, you
<br />know. And if we can’t, then we can come back here a month from now and we’ll do the
<br />contested case; and we’ll go that way. But maybe it’s time to just, you know, talk to the
<br />community, see if we can get everybody on the same plate. And then we can, you know,
<br />and just, I mean, it’s one idea; and I think what we need is we need to get, I don’t know,
<br />we need to get the approval of Ms. Labisores ‘cause we have -. But, well, I guess, what
<br />I’m saying is if we just defer any action on this, we could come back next month and
<br />perhaps not go the contested case route.
<br />GALDONES:Just -.
<br />YUEN:Could I make a suggestion though? I would suggest that the
<br />Commission take a vote on the standing question. It’s clear that the applicant needs to do
<br />some work with Water and Fire Departments to have a project that can go forward. So
<br />action is not eminent on, we couldn’t -. Had this not had any opposition today, we
<br />couldn’t have acted on it today anyway. But since the matter is before you with a request
<br />20
<br />
<br />
|