Laserfiche WebLink
for standing from Ms. Cazimero, go ahead and vote on it; and then we can wait on further <br />action after that. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yuen, as a follow up to your suggestion then if, through the <br />process that Ms. Solomon introduces an amendment to her initial proposal that we are <br />considering, then the parties would be able to work this out and perhaps come to some <br />understanding, and the contested case hearing may be withdrawn by the petitioners? <br />YUEN:Yes, that’s a possibility. <br />GALDONES:Okay. Commissioner Fujikawa? <br />FUJIKAWA:So, in other words, I could go ahead and make a motion to grant <br />standing to Mrs. Cazimero, right? <br />GALDONES:You’re introducing a motion? <br />FUJIKAWA:Yeah. <br />GALDONES:Is there a -? <br />SPRINGER:Second. <br />GALDONES:It has been moved by Commissioner Fujikawa and seconded by <br />Commissioner Springer that the petition for standing in a contested case hearing by <br />Mr. and Mrs. Cazimero be granted. Further discussion? Jeff, has Ms. Cazimero met all <br />of the requirements to be a legible, to be a petitioner? <br />DARROW:Yes, she has, Mr. Chairman. Again, they are located within the <br />300 feet distance, they have submitted payment, and they have submitted a timely <br />application. <br />GALDONES:Great. Thank you, Jeff. Any further discussion? Hearing none, <br />Jeff? <br />DARROW:Commissioner Fujikawa? <br />FUJIKAWA:Aye. <br />DARROW:Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:Yes. <br />DARROW:Commissioner Alameda? <br />ALAMEDA:Aye. <br />21 <br /> <br />